Why hasn't Bush done anything about the outrageous genocide that has been taking place in Darfur for the last

Question

three years instead of sending our troops to be killed in Iraq who was not a threat to the US!

Could it be because there is no oil there?

Answer 1

Because there is nothing there that he wants, only desperate people who genuinely want and need help. So much for the "Compassionate Conservative".
ELIZABETH: The difference is , the people of Iraq do not want our help, and Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 anyway. Could you be so blase if you were watching a three year old child be gang-raped while her mother is burned alive and her father's eyes are being gouged out? These are the atrocities happening in Darfur where people are BEGGING for Coalition intervention unlike Iraq.
SILKSTOCKINGS: Yes there is OIL in Darfur and it is controlled by the government (the ones who are doing the killing), not by the people who need help, so Bush could care less.

Answer 2

Why is the US considered the world police??? Where is China, Russia, Germany, France to name a few?? Why aren't they there "helping" out?? How is it the US only gets a bad wrap? Now once we handle the sick and the dieing as well as the homeless here in OUR own country, then we will take a look at Darfur...
As for Iraq not being a threat, do you not remember 9/11? How about the vow we made to take the fight to terrorists instead of here at home?? So are you saying there are no terrorists in Iraq? I sat in Operation Southern Watch and could not tell you how many times I had to watch our planes get shot at or how many times Saddam sent Scud missiles into the No Fly Zone for a "test". He financed terrorism as well as committed GENOCIDE against his own countrymen. Oh and his WMD program made it into Syria before we were able to intercept it...need I say more?

Answer 3

You have to be consistent. You say Iraq is not a threat to the US, neither is Darfur. So, which is it to be? US troops go where there is or is not a threat to the US? You cannot have it both ways.

And I can see you if he is does send forces to Darfur, the cry will go up, 'the US is not the world's policeman'. You are going to complain whatever happens.

Answer 4

particular, certainly Bush has completed extra effective than any international chief attempting to end the genocide in Darfur. Bush become the 1st international chief to call Darfur a genocide. No different u . s . a . on the UN different than the U. S., has certainly referred to as darfur a genocide. Bush has pushed for UN Peace Keepers to be sent to Darfur for the final 7 years. yet China has resisted sending UN Peace keepers and Sudan ought to approve allowing UN Peace Keepers into Darfur. Permission Sudan has no longer given. u . s . a . of america is finding out to purchase the African Union Peace Keepers in the Sudan. Thats all Sudan will enable in. below UN regulations, the UN ought to intervene in all Genocides, thats why no different u . s . a . to boot the U. S., has publicly referred to as whats happening in Darfur a genocide. Bush ought to unilaterally intervene in Sudan, yet with all the critism he took for doing that throughout Iraq, why might he do it returned? No different u . s . a . will unilaterally intervene, no longer after critizing the U. S. for unilaterally going into Iraq. they have trapped themselves via thier very own critisms of the U. S.. particular there is oil in Sudan, alot of oil, guess that blows the whole oil element out the window. yet via far, the biggest issues in combating the genocide in Darfur, Is Chinas's refusal to allow the UN to place rigidity on Sudan to settle for UN Peace Keepers. between the unintended consiquences of the invasion in Iraq, Is the particularly vocal critism of the U. S. for the intervention, potential that no u . s . a . will now intervene without UN approval, no remember how mandatory the intervention is. below Chatper 6 of the UN shape, the UN can not forcefully deliver UN Peace Keepers into any u . s . a ., without thier permission.

Answer 5

because they don't have anything we WANT, like oil. even though people in iraq were suffering, there was no genocide, no WMD, and the people of darfur are dying and murdered everyday. if there was oil or natural gas or some other huge economic benefit for us there it would be of higher priority. bush and our entire government is based on greed and money. it's depressing.

Answer 6

I think Paul B. wins the "most disturbed poster" award.
Every post he makes is about Bush. He doesnt care if what he says is wrong, as long as he can say it.
Dude, get out of your moms basement before its too late! Get a job and a life.

Answer 7

He's too busy with Iraq & Afghanistan.