2007-03-13 09:19:15 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes it is.
2007-03-13 13:18:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The lamest congress is the one that voted to put us in a war with Iraq over the lies of the even lamer executive branches claim of WMD. Still want to see just one WMD, just one, is that to much to ask for. After all that was the reason, of the current administration was it not??
2007-03-13 09:28:19 · answer #2 · answered by mhp_wizo_93_418 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The lamest started in 2000 and ended in 2005.
2007-03-13 09:22:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
probably would be a depressing failure yet GW maintains to do dumb issues for the RNC. Amnesty author chosen via Bush to circulate GOP On November 13, 2006, President Bush named Florida Senator Mel Martinez using fact the chairman of the Republican national Committee (RNC) for the 2007-2008 election cycle. As stated in CongressDaily, Martinez informed newshounds that he will maintain his Senate seat at the same time as performing as party chairman. Mike Duncan, the RNC's usual guidance and a former party treasurer, will run the day by day operations on the party's Capitol Hill headquarters. Assuming that he's shown via the RNC inner vote, Martinez will take over in January 2007, changing cutting-edge RNC chairman Ken Mehlman. Martinez has been a staunch supporter of President Bush and has fought to bypass the President's centred visitor-worker amnesty concept. In April 2006, whilst amnesty supporters ought to no longer get sufficient votes to bypass the centred visitor worker amnesty legislations recommended via the Senate Judiciary Committee, Senator Martinez, alongside with Senator Chuck Hagel (R-NE) presented the "Hagel-Martinez compromise" centred visitor worker amnesty legislations. This legislations, which created a tiered gadget for granting amnesty, become ultimately handed via the Senate as S.2611. the determination of Senator Martinez to run the RNC is seen via many analysts as inspired via the wish he will entice Hispanic electorate to the Republican party.
2016-11-25 01:03:44 · answer #4 · answered by shiley 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Totally lame!!! Bush is now a lame duck President but the Congress is lame by choice and fear. They don't want to rock the boat in case enough Americans get upset and don't re- elect them. But with the condition the world is in nowadays, this could be more dangerous than doing the wrong thing!! Bad leaders don't make bad choices - they make no choices!!
2007-03-13 09:24:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. Most pathetic excuse for a president America has ever had, though. Congress compares favorably, if only by default.
2007-03-13 09:22:29 · answer #6 · answered by David 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No, the lamest was the one that conducted a witchhunt after Clinton, SUCCEEDED in finding something to impeach him for, and then still couldn't convict him.
2007-03-13 09:22:24 · answer #7 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Lame, but not the lamest. The one directly preceeding was way worse.
2007-03-13 09:22:58 · answer #8 · answered by Underground Man 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The "do nothing" Republican Congress of 1948 was by far the worst. That's what Truman called them, and very few people will disagree.
2007-03-13 09:21:54 · answer #9 · answered by Villain 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Same as our lame duck president Bushie.
2007-03-13 09:33:50 · answer #10 · answered by Lou 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the Republican DO NOTHING
2006 voter rejection congress was worst
2007-03-13 09:23:30 · answer #11 · answered by impeachbushnoww 1 · 2⤊ 2⤋