for example lets say theres a thoery in which it is necesserily incoherent and it is foundationless in order for it to be logicaly consistent to itself. does this mean that the thoery is flawed??
2007-03-13 09:10:23 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
ya it is uselessly flawed. Every theory has to have a foundation upon which it builds implications.
2007-03-13 09:13:28 · answer #1 · answered by The Machine 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A theory must have a logic base to be acceptable otherwise it stands on one person's thoughts and that makes the theory subjective and people doubt about it.
2007-03-13 16:14:32 · answer #2 · answered by M?r?? P 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Whatever works and gets the job done that's acceptable to society. Do it and people will beat a path to your door.
2007-03-13 16:14:39 · answer #3 · answered by bobweb 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A theory is a speculative idea. It could never be wrong or right unless proven.
2007-03-13 16:15:20 · answer #4 · answered by lanisoderberg69 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What the hell are you on; i want some
2007-03-13 16:13:39 · answer #5 · answered by Bertie D 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no.
2007-03-13 16:14:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋