in 2000 there arose such a clatter about florida...both sides claiming foul.....but in the end.....who one after throwing military votes out? then in 2004 they placed bush up against a joke.........there are no parties for the super rich..,.,,only power, and the need for more.....i feel we should be watchful and cautious.......your thoughts?
this is my opinion, please dont attack it, leave your opinion...i read them all
2007-03-13 08:30:06 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
once again i feel the need to look into the deeper issue than the elections individually........no wonder we got duped
2007-03-13 08:36:04 · update #1
i feel the need to explain...is what i meant to say........look deeper.....
2007-03-13 08:36:51 · update #2
why talk and not act? um cause i dont want to go to jail for threatening the govt.... dude got arrested and detained for days for talking about starting a revolution (i was there....he was more energetic than i woulda been,,,,but well within his rights) i think this is just the beginning...thats all
2007-03-13 08:40:35 · update #3
6 years later you ask? you voted for him, thats all there is to it
2007-03-13 08:33:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Even if you think the 1990 election wasn't fair, G.W Bush was re-elected with a majority of the votes in 2004.
We should always be watchful and cautious; good point.
What's wrong with being rich? I wish I was. (I am in many ways, but not cashola) Does anyone wish to be poor? What's wrong with power, don't you want the power to make a difference? The difference is those who talk about it and those who do it.
BTW, hope you get lots of intelligent responses and not the nonsense.
2007-03-13 15:37:31 · answer #2 · answered by Partisanshipsux 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sad to say Bush is our leader,it was him or Kerry, I didn't vote for either. The truth is we desperately need a third viable party. I believe that the country can't afford to much longer with Bush. (Iraq, deficit, borders), he's in Mexico today, guess who's calling the shots, and guess who's Kowtowing.
2007-03-13 15:41:26 · answer #3 · answered by niddlie diddle 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush cheated the first time. The second time it was given to him by the Democrats who put up a weenie against Bush.
2007-03-13 15:34:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes, bush was elected under every recount variation the libs threw at them.
That is an old michael moore lie. (Do people still believe him?)
On the below website, click "control F", then type in election, and read away.
http://www.davekopel.org/Terror/Fiftysix-Deceits-in-Fahrenheit-911.htm
2007-03-13 15:33:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋