did 9/11 really happen the way the government said?

Answer 1

Yes, which by the way happens to be just as I saw that it happened.

Answer 2

No. It happened exactly as it unfolded on film. Two planes hit the towers, one hit the Pentagon, another crashed before it reached it's target. A basic understanding of physics and chemistry supply the rest. The government simply reported the facts, after the fact.

Answer 3

Pretty much, but I doubt we'll ever get the whole truth.

There are way too many questionable events, coincences and missing evidence. For example- why is there NO video of the plane hitting the pentagon? That place must be the most surveilled place in the country, yet we have 1/2 a dozen frames from a parking lot monitor. Video from nearby businesses disapeared. there's not video from the penagon itself. Why?

Answer 4

Mr. Foog and others.

Get a copy of each of the books listed below. Read them and pass them along to others. When you are done reading you will have a very good idea of what happened on 9/11. Both are well documented.

You will discover things you did not know about and some things you suspected were true but wanted confirmation about.

Answer 5

Well, as far as the Twin Towers, yes it happened it that way - from an eye witness to the event. A doctor's wife whom we dealth with where I worked watched the whole thing take place from her living room window. They live in a high rise near where the towers were. She saw the plane and saw it hit and the whole aftermath. No way that could have been faked. Watching a plane go into the Pentagon on live TV would also constitute a big YES to your question.

Answer 6

It's hard to say.

Though this administrations adamant refusal to comply with any investigations into the events leading up to, and occuring on 9/11 is pretty telling.

Not to mention the expediency they used in getting rid of all of the evidence by selling off all of the rubble to the chinese.

The more time goes by, the less chance there is that we will ever know the whole truth.

I don't buy into conspiracy theories, but I do know that the Bush administration was warned repeatedly about the danger that Osama Bin Laden posed, and rather than taking any of these warnings seriously, they chose to mock the people who warned them.

And in the long run, the vast majority of the 9/11 terrorists were saudis. Since Dubya invaded afghanistan trying to get osama (and failed), and then invaded Iraq based on false pretenses (leaving afghanistan to descend into chaos while terrorists fill their bank accounts with the proceeds from record opium production) it is surprising that the Saudi's get off scot free (well, not to surprising considering the relationship between dubyas family and the house of saud).

Answer 7

Yes, but I do believe if the USA government would have taken the warnings more serious it may have been avoided, the government covers their butts, just like everyone else, although, we are to trust them 100%, I do not.

Answer 8

Here's a thought that actually may help you people move forward from something that happened almost 6 years ago.

Stop dredging up half-brained, half-baked schemes and realize that every time you do, something along the line of this happens....

3000+ families relive the death of a loved one!

Answer 9

Let me think back. I saw airplanes fly into buildings. Building eventually collapsed.
If that is how the government is telling it, then that is how it really happened.

Answer 10

Yes. How could that many witnesses all be telling the same lie? The witnesses were of every type (gender, race, religion, political belief, etc.) - there is no way they could all agree on the same lie.

Answer 11

there's way to much video footage from sources not controlled by the government for the conspiracy nuts to prevail, you'll just have to find something else to accuse the government of conspiring about