Too bad you will be severly outnumbered. The anti-war protesters usually come out in droves. And WE ARE SUPPORTING THE TROOPS!!! I'm sick of reading the arrogant and ignorant hooplah concerning this!!! READ THIS from A.N.S.W.E.R.'s website:
Thousands of veterans and military families, including those who have lost loved ones in Iraq, will be in the front ranks of the March on the Pentagon. Some tiny pro-Bush groups who support the war in Iraq, and who normally mobilize about 25 people to hold signs when massive antiwar protests take place, are now callously trying to manipulate Vietnam veterans by spreading rumors that the March on the Pentagon will defile the Vietnam Memorial. This lie should be treated with the same contempt that people have for the other lies promoted by Bush and his followers to justify an illegal war of aggression: Iraq had Weapons of Mass Destruction; Iraq was responsible for the September 11 attacks; and that the U.S. occupation would be greeted as an act of liberation by the Iraqi people. Enough lies. Enough deceit
2007-03-13 08:25:11 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Oh my question...that's right... Eagles, where are the rest of you???
2007-03-13 08:30:57 · update #1
Kapute2 - You've SEEN??? Where??? I WAS THERE AT LIKE 10 OF THEM!!! We filled the street in droves. Don't believe everything you see on TV!!!
2007-03-13 08:33:04 · update #2
From what I've been reading the anti-war protest will be huge.
I hope the media doesn't manipulate the event as they did with a Clinton pro-impeachment rally led by republican Bob Barr. C-span showed the entire scene and there was only around 50 people but the mainstream media never showed the entire scene.
2007-03-13 08:34:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
in the past you get too disillusioned you ought to examine the regulations of the NFL and NFLPA, and then base your argument on the data. He has completed his time in the criminal gadget, and is now unfastened to circulate forward together with his existence. The Eagles made a smart circulate, to boot their stadium has jails and a courtroom abode on internet site. which will help shop the protesters who make the sport risky for followers and families coming to observe a sport in extra useful verify. Protesting is one element (Like the way you're doing it right here), yet for a protester to circulate to the sport and make it uncomfortable for regulation abiding electorate to observe a sport would not provide your edge of the argument any credibility- they are being only as undesirable (in a diverse way) as Vick, purchase inflicting a public nuisance and risk (disorderly habit- for the main section). Vick will help McNabb, and can be an amazing addition in the backfield in the Wildcat offense. The Eagles mandatory some intensity at QB besides, as McNabb is getting old and Kevin Kolb with 0 TD's and four concepts is the backup without Vick in the image. For Westbrook, Mcnabb, and all the different Eagles including Vick must be the lacking link to winning a SB, even though it would additionally become like bringing in TO. Time will tell- for now the Eagles are 0-2 in great Bowls.
2016-11-25 00:56:39 · answer #2 · answered by lineback 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Congress must assert itself. Too much power has shifted to the executive branch, not just in terms of waging war but also in planning the military of the future. Congress should remember it still has the power of the purse; it should call U.S. generals, colonels, captains and sergeants to testify frequently, so that their opinions and needs are known to the men they lead. Then when they are asked if they have enough troops - and no soldier has ever had enough of anything, more is always better - the reply is public."
Paul D. Eaton, a retired U.S. Army major general, was in charge of training the Iraqi military from 2003 to 2004
2007-03-13 08:44:57 · answer #3 · answered by Global warming ain't cool 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You can't possibly support the troops IF you are marching on the Pentagon.
I guess you really don't care that these things ARE broadcast and seen by the troops.
The Vietnam veterans WILL be there....just to protect the icons of America.....especially their Memorial.
But....I'm sure you're just tempted to spit on them....
We all KNOW Iraq wasn't a part of 9/11....BUT they were in DIRECT violation of the end of the first Gulf War....or did you forget that we already had a run-in with them...
Memory refresher.... IRAQ INVADED KUWAIT!!!
And the terms of the end of the first war were repeatedly violated!!!
2007-03-13 08:38:43 · answer #4 · answered by Nibbles 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
If you dont like the war, thats one thing, but support our troops! My son is a US Marine, and the guys there apreciate all the support we can muster. I was in Viet Nam, I came home and was spit upon and had bottles tossed at me, we need to honor our fighting men and women
2007-03-13 08:38:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
That's good news. As a combat vet. I'm pleased to see the support of our troops and the President. I was one of those that was spat upon when I came home from Viet Nam and was escorting the body of one of my friends to his loved ones. I would challenge you to give us the name of one of the families that will be joining you. Why don't you drop by the Wall and recruit a few more. Watch. The "troop supporters "will not be able to give a vet the thumbs down fast enough
2007-03-13 08:36:36 · answer #6 · answered by ohbrother 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
As to make this clear, Only anti-war protesters have the Right to be heard? People only have the right to speak out against injustice if they agree with you? If the Gathering of Eagles is not a concern of the powerful anti-war movement, then why was it so important to shut them up by hacking their server and crashing their system?
NOT THIS TIME
2007-03-13 08:34:27 · answer #7 · answered by Mother 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Most of your protesters are protesting about everything and anything,except the war. A Gathering Of Eagles will soar! Don't you worry your stoned head about it.
2007-03-13 08:40:16 · answer #8 · answered by Wendy 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
We are sick of your arrogance and ignorance.
Supporting the troops means you actually do something to support them, not do marches that show you do not want to see them accomplish the goals.
Your entire post is full of lies and deceit.
2007-03-13 08:31:33 · answer #9 · answered by az 4 · 4⤊ 4⤋
You do realize protesting the very mission our troops fight and die for isn't support..It's just more proof liberals hate our fine men and women in uniform.
2007-03-13 08:34:32 · answer #10 · answered by . 6 · 4⤊ 4⤋