Can I get an HELL NO! Because MJ's imput is what made it a DYNASTY team, not a championship team that wins 1 or 2 titles and that's it, MJ made it a dynasty team(big difference). See a championship team is a team that won but you'll hardly remember. A dynasty team is a team that won multiple times & people are going to argue that that's the best team in history. Have you ever heard of a superstar amongst stars? Like Michael Jordan being amongst Caron Butler, Lamar Odom, Roy Jones Jr., Ja Rule, Michael Vick, & etc. Well that's what a dynasty is to a championship team. A superstar compared to a star. MJ's imput is what made the Bulls dynasty status, Pippen's & Phil's imput DIDN'T EVEN make the Bulls championship status. Example: If Pippen & Phil put as much imput as MJ did, well in 94 after MJ's 1st retirement they should of dropped from dynasty status to championship status. But without MJ their imput wasn't even NBA CONFENCE FINALS STATUS..LOL. Pippen & Phil got put out the 2nd round!
2007-03-13 08:20:38 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Basketball
and MJ without Pippen & Phil was during a developing process. A college kid who joined a mans league that's full of vets with tricks that MJ haven't learned. Pippen & Phil without MJ was already past their developing process. So MJ haters it's not even fair to compare that!
2007-03-13 08:27:43 · update #1
Smitty,
you're a basketball moron! 94 demonstrates what type of team Pippen & Phil made it. They couldn't even make it to the conference finals. But with MJ they were a dynasty team! If you take Pippen & Phil away the Bulls still could of won a title. MJ made that team!
2007-03-13 08:34:24 · update #2
While there is no way to measure the contribution of Jordan, there is, however a benefit in having the greatest coach ever on your bench and a 5 time all-star as a "role player" on your team. Individually there has never been a more influintial player than Jordan however Pippen and Phil together come up just a very little bit short of having an equal influence as Jordan. All-in-all, without Jordan, the Bulls would not have been a dynasty, however without Phil Jackson and a Pippen-like player, the Bulls would have won two out of 10 rings instead of 6 out of ten. Without Jordan they might have won one in a 15 year spand.
2007-03-13 08:28:11 · answer #1 · answered by tfromdai 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jordan may have certainly performed it without Pippen and Phil yet he might want to no longer have performed it without yet another participant of pippens nice. i imagine of Phil's position of their championships is more beneficial acceptable than fairly puffed up. inspite of the obtrusive undeniable actuality that one participant should not be able to win a championship on my own (except everyone else is unfavourable) by actuality of this a helping solid is severe. as well the reality that i imagine of you're ninety 9.9% precise interior the reality that it did not may nicely be Pippen fiddling with him and the instructor didnt may nicely be Phil to win those championships. a magnificent participant makes everyone else round him more beneficial efficient, that became the case with Jordan and Pippen, Jordan allowed Pippen to come back back into his personal as a good participant by ability of many diverse options. i have were given faith that Jordan may have presented the similar portion of the table with basically about anyother team.
2016-12-01 22:51:48 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that either way you look at it, they all needed each other to be a dynasty. Without any one of them they wouldn't have won as many championships as they did. MJ was obviously the most important piece of the puzzle, but they all had their parts. That's why they're a great TEAM.
2007-03-13 08:50:18 · answer #3 · answered by zaroo21 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like your mindis made up. But 2 quick questions who supplied the Triangle and who would hold the opposing teams best player???? If pippen wasnt holding Stockton/malone thats right both depending on who was on floor or if they didnt have him to hold GP or having him hold bakley /K.Johnson I dont think it would have been as easy. Do you honeslty think they could have a dynasty with out either one of those guys. Dont forget HO GRANT he played kep part in first couple championships and getting them there Unless you think Bill Wennington and Luc lOngley was the keys
2007-03-13 08:31:08 · answer #4 · answered by Lord Vader 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You call six titles a dynasty? Bill Russell, baby...that's THE dynasty!
None of this "six titles" crap... I asked Russell about the Bulls and he said "yeah, they won six titles, that's great...but you know something? I won six titles too... in the FIRST HALF of my career... then I added ANOTHER five titles in the second half."
Michael never won a single playoff series without Scottie Pippen. NOT A SINGLE ONE! Name ONE Jordan team that EVER made it out of the FIRST ROUND of the playoffs... can't do it? I didn't think so... 'cause it NEVER HAPPENED!
2007-03-15 15:59:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Before Phil (and the triangle) Jordan scored points but didn't win. Not until Phil introduced the Triangle did the Bulls start to win and Jordan really flourish
2007-03-13 08:29:36 · answer #6 · answered by nfntryblue32 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absalutley they had as much input.Without Phil and Scottie..
MJ would be a baldheaded Dominique Wilkins...Great Talent but no rings!...................even without MJ they were one of the top 5 teams in the NBA..so what NOW!...to easy.......
2007-03-13 08:22:41 · answer #7 · answered by Alpha Wolf(Bringer of Rain) 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
U KNOW NOTHING ABOUT THE GAME, TYPICAL OF THE YOUNG GENERATION. WITHOUT PIPPEN AND PHIL, THERE IS NO DYNASTY.
p.s. what is hilarous, clowns that ask questions and go "psyco" over the answers.
2007-03-13 08:26:39 · answer #8 · answered by smitty 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
"BALD-HEADED DOMINIQUE, BABY!! LOL
2007-03-14 12:11:51 · answer #9 · answered by Hoopfan 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋