Who thinks we need term limits for U.S. Congressmen and Senators?

Answer 1

While I'm in favor of the idea on principle, it only means that the experienced politicos will simply shuffle positions in ways that while they my only serve in Congress for roughly twenty years (Two terms in the Senate is twelve years alone, and the House would justify anywhere from two to five terms, I'd imagine), they'll still be influencing Capitol Hill while they're on life support in the hospital, croaking out demands from the old guard.

Answer 2

The best thing that could happen.........but the people who can make that happen are the ones who want to spend their lives there!!!

Personally, I think it should be put to a vote in a general election where everybody would have a say in that important matter.

It's too bad the voters of each State can't accomplish term limits by changing their representatives after a few terms. They don't seem to want their representative to be "low man on the totem pole." But if there were term limits turn over would be functional and useful.....the old goats wouldn't be calling all the shots.

Answer 3

i have were given idea about this a lot and also you're proper, i know that. in spite of the undeniable fact that, we've reached the ingredient that our personal representatives at the prompt are not any more beneficial voting to fulfill the pick of the very those that they profess to help. and all and numerous who says that they at the prompt are no longer provided and paid for is inaccurate. look on the dimensions of time that distinct those human beings were in potential and 'served' their elements. Many were there because of very actuality the starting up up of time. probably the priority to do is to help time period limits yet reason them to fairly longer? If authorities might want to favor again on target by ability of creating use of being forthright and straightforward with the those that they supposedly characterize, i visit guess that we may have a significantly better decision of more beneficial efficient applicants. yet another issue of now no longer having time period limits (as I see it), is the reality that the hot representatives do now no longer stand a gamble adverse to the previous-timers as right away as they're elected into workplace. i have were given seen many new faces get slam dunked by ability of creating use of older ones because of very actuality they lack the seniority and for this reason ultimately finally end up being exceedingly a lot powerless. So what do we do? end the lobbyists? i do now no longer rather see that as a lot as an decision both.

Answer 4

We have term limits.... they're called elections.

Imposing any additional limits is basically telling people that they are incapable of exercising rational decision-making and incapable of determining when its time to remove someone from office.

Sadly, that appears to be the case in America.

Answer 5

Yep-- we've got way to many career politicians in congress. Yes, we do have elections to throw them out, but the same douchebags get relected for too many terms--

Let see those who need to go-- Kennedy, Frist, Lott, Kerry, Byrd, Fienstein, Hatch, Kyl, Roberts, Stevens (bridget to nowhere)

Answer 6

I believe very strongly that, if we can't count on the electorate to function as the term limiter, we have the wrong form of government.

Answer 7

We have always had term limits only we haven't called them by that name. We call them elections. If you don't like the incumbant vote for his challenger. What is so difficult to understand about that?

Answer 8

Absolutely!!!!!!

Answer 9

this is an issue which is LONG overdue!