Why is the White House firing so many prosecutors?

Question

Is it because they threatened not to do their bidding?

Answer 1

I see some one commented on the fact that Clinton fired U.S. attorneys when he came into office. This case is not the same. These guys WERE appointed by Bush BUT they were doing their jobs which was to follow the evidence, if there was sufficient, they went after them, if not , they did not. They did their job by seeking justice, not persecution.
As David Iglesias, one of the 9 pointed out, he was called by the republican senator numerous times to indict but he did not because the evidence was not there. Now surprisingly, he had "poor" job performance which led to his firing. This was a crock and Mr. Iglesias was able to prove he had favorable ratings up until this dust up with the Republican Senator.
Now if you notice I said 9, not 8. This is because in the mix there is a long forgotten firing that took place in the U.S. territory of Guam.
The U.S. attorney there had been opened an investigation into Jack Abramoff 2 years ago. He went bye bye and the investigation went away.
This is the pattern with the White House, protect the friends at all costs, to hell with justice

Answer 2

The obvious reason that a Republican would fire Republican appointed prosecutors is because THEY WEREN'T BIASED IN THE DIRECTION THAT WAS PRESUMED WHEN THEY WERE APPOINTED.

ONE SHOULD NEVER BE ABLE TO TELL WHAT PARTY A JUDGE BELONGS TOO.....

NEVER

and the White House obviously didn't like the decisions that came from their own people.

Maybe they should learn something instead of getting pissed.

But that's unlikely due to incredible arrogance on the part of Cheney....who really is the boss....no matter what anyone says...

Answer 3

humorous so you might point assessments and balances, for the reason that portion of the assessments and stability to which you refer is the possibility of the administrative workplace to supervise the staffing of its branch of the government. govt privilege is a very needed piece of the assessments and balances between the three branches. without that, the possibility of the President turns into subordinate to the possibility of Congress or the Judiciary. hence, it could certainly stonewall a congressional study via invoking that privilege, no remember how plenty Pat Leahy whines approximately it.

Answer 4

Or is it maybe that some of these fired ones want to dig a little deeper into the Libby,Cheney, Bush fiasco

Answer 5

They American Government knocked down the the Towers in NYC. It was an inside job.

Answer 6

It's another way to control the courts, and they got caught red handed.

Answer 7

They are scared little girls.

Anyone who might be in a position to expose them is going to get the ax.

Answer 8

Clinton fired all of the ones at the time he took office. Where is the conspiracy? More leftist propaganda spun by the leftist media.

Answer 9

They want to control the courts from two different angles.

Answer 10

why did clinton fire all prosecutors,and not one peep from the liberals?