This, reality, is not part of a virtual world and not merely a network of, computers, appliances, and machines. Those connect, only through narrow gateways, which control both message and medium. This is rather, a reality, sustained by being humane or kindred within.
Most have lost touch. Most would be unable to commune or even survive evenly and equitably as the impositions of dogma, commerce, politics and greed collapse around us all.
This is a choice all burgeoning species are given. Very, very, few survive; our species is not exempt. All too few of us, no matter who or where, are actually gaining our means within mutually tended orientation.
Such communal application is not beyond our ability to grasp; yet is demonstrated beyond our intention...as continuos destructiveness is lain waste as reserves become depleted.
Do not be concerned by what most try to become or aspire to be but rather how most remain.
Who seeks to journey as part and parcel of a whole sum?
2007-03-13 07:27:13 · 4 answers · asked by rhn 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Sorry, but you did a total fly by with me. I have no idea what you are talking about, and I don't consider myself uneducated. If I knew what you said, I may be interested.
2007-03-13 07:36:50 · answer #1 · answered by lilith663 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Communal living is not a new idea. Many have formed cooperative financial and otherwise service agreements to decrease the cost of living.
Is this what you are proposing?
You should try to keep your question straight to the point otherwise you loose the readers' trust base.
2007-03-13 14:41:43 · answer #2 · answered by lightwayvez 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
watch it guys. this is trick u=question. why cause i dont understand what is asked.
2007-03-17 14:21:56 · answer #3 · answered by J 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
am I to stupid to see the question, or is it really not there.??
2007-03-13 22:14:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋