Is it because they can't take anyone seriously politically who has won an Oscar? (Ronald Reagan) Is it because they don't like people who are associated with Hollywood to be involved in anything political? (Arnold Schwarzenegger) Why is it?
2007-03-13 06:19:21 · 16 answers · asked by Bush Invented the Google 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Because its one vote that they couldn't fix.
2007-03-13 06:22:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
1. Ronald Reagan didn't win an Oscar. He was never even nominated.
2. Arnold Schwarzenegger is NOT a conservative. He is a Republican, albiet a moderate one.
3. Global Warming is a myth and Al Gore's movie is a joke. He was awarded an Oscar by the elitist Hollywood crowd as a consolation prize for the 2000 election. That's why we don't take it seriously.
2007-03-13 06:28:01 · answer #2 · answered by cornbread 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
oscars today are useless symbols of bloated liberal approval. Both the fiction and "non-fiction" (I use that term with a large dose of sarcasm) award categories are now given out for the best promotion of democratt socialist propaganda.
So Ronald Reagan didn't win an oscar, and the implication is that he wasn't a very good actor. Yippee, a liberal finally inadvertently proves that Reagan was the real deal, as opposed to the lib's claim that his whole presidency was "an act". The prize that Ronald Reagan was awarded consisted of two landslide victories as a presidential candidate, and the historical knowledge that he brought down the Soviet empire and freed millions of oppressed people.
I'll give you ahhnold. He's not very conservative AND a bad actor. And he's married to a kennedy. I guess I'll have to feel a little sorry for him.
2007-03-13 08:52:35 · answer #3 · answered by boonietech 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
snigger at Al Gore all you want yet you shouldn't be giggling at the same time as he Captures "guy bear Pig" and brings this creature back alive for all to work out and owing to stupid Al you'd be able to study all about this insane journey correct right here on the information superhighway he invented,, sure it may look the NPP is now being given away to the most important jerks and liars obtainable so is it any ask your self Obama were given one?? and also you may have self assurance with each of the stupid idiotic issues Obama has finished so a procedures he likely receives yet another one next year back to back and basically may save getting them each year until eventually we vote his dumbass out in 2012//// guy the Npp is a higher funny tale than Joe Biden vice president////
2016-12-01 22:42:13 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is because he did a "documentary", that makes several points that are absolutely inaccurate. Had a conservative done a documentary on an issue, it would be ripped apart by liberals, and Hollywood even if everything were factually solid. Al Gore has chosen to state falsehoods, and is not only receiving a pass on it, he has been rewarded and celebrated, simply because it suits the liberal agenda.
2007-03-13 06:34:04 · answer #5 · answered by Jon B 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because only a bunch of rich Hollywood celebs would give an award to a man who preached about the environment from the seat of his private jet. It's right there in the movie! Priceless.
I also liked how he whined about the hanging chad in a movie about the environment. The movie itself was a joke, even if you believe in global warming. LOL
2007-03-13 06:33:58 · answer #6 · answered by MEL T 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because like all of Michael Moore's so called documentaries, Al Gore's is filled with half truths, manipulations of facts and total lies. Al Gore spends more on heat and electricity for his primary personal residence in one month than the average American spends in one year. I wouldn't trust any politicians any more than I would trust a lawyer.
Here are some articles about scientists who do support the Global Warming Theory, so not all scientists agree.
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=\Nation\archive\200409\NAT20040915c.html
http://weathereye.kgan.com/expert/warming/skeptic.html
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2006/harris061206.htm
2007-03-13 06:37:53 · answer #7 · answered by Andy 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I don't trash it. I just ignore it. It is like the foxes union giving one particualr fox an award for the best guarding of a hen house.
2007-03-13 08:36:54 · answer #8 · answered by namsaev 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have no problem with Mr Environment's Oscar. Golly, it's only a representation of a group of know-nothings patting each other on the back.
More oscars to him. His movie was a hoot!
2007-03-13 06:26:57 · answer #9 · answered by credo quia est absurdum 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The Oscars themselves cannot be taken seriously.
2007-03-13 06:28:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well,it wasn't like it was a surpise now (getting the Oscar),was it? Is it true he has a special little limo for it to ride around in? LOL!
2007-03-13 06:24:35 · answer #11 · answered by bugeyes 4 · 4⤊ 2⤋