who cares how you spell it, we understand what you are trying to say! hee hee. AND YES IMPEACH HIM!
2007-03-13 06:02:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
George W. Bush should be prosecuted with extreme prejudice. He has destroyed the American Middle Class. He has destroyed Iraq, destabilized the entire Middle East, and threatens much more of the same.
He is responsible for the deaths of over 3000 American service personnel. He is responsible for some 600000+ dead Iraqis.
He has committed blatent treason by outting a CIA agent and her spy netwrok.
He was on vacation when Katrina happened. No President has ever taken so much vacation.
2007-03-13 16:24:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Vernon 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
So in concept GW has carried out something incorrect. Now u initiate Impeachment courtroom circumstances. And in the interim the place are our priorities? First you will possibly be able to desire to violate a regulation presently on the books. 2d you spend a pair of 12 months or 2 proving this. And if u get previous all of the hearings and BS who precisely wins? WJ Clinton lied during a police analyze concerning a sexual harrassment criticism. He lied two times. He lied during a press convention to a rustic. So, impeachment somewhat would not artwork. in case you sense Bush merits this write him on the White domicile. in the interim infantrymen die and no recommendations purely politics as commonplace. Polls oftentimes misrepresent the certainty and sense of the inhabitants. purely extra BS in my e book. Excuses for failure interior the domicile. extra altered / pretend information. Madamn Pelosi promised if elected she does no longer pass forward with any kind of Impeachment of the present President. Did she mislead get into the chair and desire for a brilliant selection plane and previous? I hate Math. None of those numbers upload as much as certainty purely yet another b*tch consultation.
2016-10-18 06:57:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That would be a waste of time and money. I hope he is still alive by next election day, but I dont expect that to happen. He would be the 1st president elected in a year ending in zero who was not shot or died from some other cause while still in office, I dont think he'll make it.
2007-03-13 12:36:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by Tim'sSO 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You didn't. It's "grammar". (Although you probably should have said "spelling" as grammar would be a totally different issue.) It doesn't take a degree in astrophysics to use the "check spelling" button.
At it's peak (during the election hoopla), the hysteria for impeachment raked in 32% support. It's much smaller now. (Interestingly enough, that is almost the same percentage polled at the same time who believed that America could never win this war.)
2007-03-13 06:01:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Lori K, let's review your off-topic criticism of the Asker.
"You didn't. It's "grammar". ... It doesn't take a degree in astrophysics to use the "check spelling" button. .... At it's [sic] peak (during the election hoopla), the hysteria..."
In addition to this uncharitable post, your profile also ridicules people who misspell things. However, look at your last line, above; ironically, your use of "it's" is improper. "Hysteria" is the noun. It requires a possessive pronoun - - "its."
A very common mistake, sure. I'm just sayin'....Throwing stones, glass houses....all that stuff. =-)
2007-03-13 07:06:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by ShakaBuku 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
A large majority of the American would like to see justice in the time of George Walker Bush but they are afraid to see Cheney as president.
To them I say, don't worry, because if Bush is impeached, you'd better believe that Cheney will walk the line and stop breaking laws.
These two outlaws, just as Nixon was, need to be taught that the long arm of the law is not out of their reach.
.
2007-03-13 06:04:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Brotherhood 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
9
2007-03-13 06:00:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
There are definitely multiple grounds for impeachment, though I doubt we'll see it happen... Democrats in Congress are not (quite) as childish, hypocritical, and politically opportunist as the adulterous, lying, thieving counterparts that lead the charge against Clinton.
And, it's "spelled that right" and "grammar".
2007-03-13 06:09:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by kena2mi 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Count me in! Most of Congress needs to be impeached also. They have also ignored the Constitution that they took an oath to uphold.
2007-03-13 06:03:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by mikey 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
One. And that would be you, you liberal fool. There is no valid reason to impeach him, because if there was a reason, then he would have been impeached by now. So just leave the man alone. He is doing a much better job than Kerry could ever do.
2007-03-13 06:02:59
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋