Isn't it AMAZING how the voting machines were miraculously fixed when the Democrats won the election?

Question

It's amazing how many accounts of voter fraud we heard of in the '04 election, but apparently ALL of that voter fraud disappeared in the '06 election! What a great turnaround!!

Or maybe, was it that the Democrats were simply sore losers? Naaah...

Answer 1

The number one reason I am proud to be a Republican is because we are good sports and never cry about elections. I never hear a Republican complain about not understanding ballots. Even Hillary last week was preaching to a mostley black crowd saying that they are always getting cheated during elections. She is a terrible individual and a huge liar. I have zero respect for her.

Answer 2

a million.) the position is your source on your allegations of the 2006 elections? that's a exceedingly sturdy issue to assert without information provided. 2.) there are various of voing machines that are hackable. in spite of the undeniable fact that the emblem you provided, diebold machines, are produced and dispensed by ability of a accurate reupublican supporter and fundraiser. 3.)The fact about go out polls exhibiting on issue then the election outcomes exhibiting the option is precisely what befell in 2004 the position Senator Kerry had the lead in the go out polls yet nevertheless lost in the overall. The vote casting machines without paper path problem both the left and the right, in spite of the undeniable fact that the criteria made in this question weren't researched o.k..

Answer 3

There were still problems with the machines in the '06 elections, especially in Florida. Without a paper audit trail we will never know what the real count for either party. Some of the machines even broke down so, what ever happened to those people votes? I guess it was nothing because they could not vote.

Answer 4

I agree with your answer. The Democrats are sore losers when it comes to an election. When serving their terms, the Democrats back out of withdrawing from Iraq because they're so use to complaining instead of resolving issues. In power the Democrats are weakened because their party likes the idea of being the under-dog.

Answer 5

yes, amazingly in '06 the number of votes cast in a district did not exceed the number of registered voters of that district as was the case in '04. Dems don't mind losing when the playing field is level, good observation.

Answer 6

Did you hear what happened in WA??? The Republican won the governor's race, but it was close, so there was a mandatory recount. He won again, so the Dem. lady called for another recount. She won that one, and took office. Now tell me how that works??

There is a bumper sticker that says "She's not my Governor" and another, my favorite, "If at first you don't succeed, count, count again." I say best 2 out of 3 wins. Rossi for gvr of WA!!

Answer 7

The voting machines do not meet federal standards of security and accuracy regardless of who wins there is a possibility of erroneous results. Since there is not paper record of the vote as well a manual recount is out of the question.

It is quite possibly the dumbest voting system ever devised (yes dumber than chads). I am slightly appalled that we leave the Democratic process to machines we know are inaccurate.

Answer 8

No, it's because that when the votes are in their favour, they're more than willing to overlook any irregularities. Same goes with the Republicans.
You're not going to demand a recount if you've already been declared winner.

Answer 9

No I don't think so. That was an issue in 04 because the votes were close.

Answer 10

voter fraud has always been a part of america, by both parties. elimination of fraud is a good thing, but noone wants to give up their aces.