2007-03-13 03:07:22 · 18 answers · asked by Mike E 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
no...quite simply there has been no crime committed. A crime must be committed for a president to be impeached. Andrew Johnson was impeached on corruption charges, Bill Clinton was impeached on Purjury charges, NEITHER has happened in George Bush's case. People just want to impeach him because they disagree with him.
2007-03-13 03:10:16 · answer #1 · answered by Cato 4 · 6⤊ 3⤋
No.
An investigation would take so long that he would be out of office before we could even impeach him, much less try him and remove him from office for anything. And that's ASSUMING there's ANY evidence he's committed a crime, which there is not. You cannot impeach a President simply because you don't like him (unless you back him into a corner, question him under oath about impertinent nonsense that isn't anyone's business and make him feel like he has to lie, in which case, yes, you can force an impeachment through simply because you don't like the guy).
I am a Democrat. I do not support Bush. But I don't support impeachment either. It's a waste of governmental resources.
2007-03-13 10:11:53 · answer #2 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
nope.. I think Impeachment only hurts our nation.. even if Bush were impeached on some crime (and removed) he'd be pardoned and the US would just be entertainment for the rest of the world.. like some sort of reality TV show while it was going on... Same as it was in the Clinton impeachments hearings.... the only way I would support it is if there was significant evidence of horrific offenses against people... and to my knowledge there is none.
2007-03-13 10:18:30 · answer #3 · answered by pip 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes, absolutely. Don't forget, an impeachment is the _trial_, which would definitely clear the air of all the false accusations that the liberals are making against our president.
Impeach away! Let's clear this thing up and get a _responsible_ person in office, not a lib.
2007-03-13 10:15:00 · answer #4 · answered by credo quia est absurdum 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No, there is no offense that constitutes impeachment. I do not believe in impeacing just because we dont like a president.
2007-03-13 10:13:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely. Those that say he committed no crimes deserve neither freedom nor the rights they still have, much less the ones he has violated/stolen. they seem perfectly content with "if you'd done nothing wrong then you have nothing to fear" I guess they forget about the millions of Jews who were slaughtered because they believed that back in the late 1930's and early 1940's.
2007-03-13 10:24:02 · answer #6 · answered by Alan S 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
How many times does it have to be said: There has to be an impeacheable offense...You cannot impeach on the grounds that you don't like or agree with him...............
2007-03-13 10:12:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
No. As much as I'd like to kick the guy out of office, impeachment would not get the required 60% of the votes in the Senate, so it would all be a collosal waste of time, just like Clinton's impeachment was.
2007-03-13 10:10:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 5⤋
Absolutely.
For the good of the country. Give it back to a leader who will listen to the will of the people!
2007-03-13 10:18:16 · answer #9 · answered by Dastardly 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Definately yes
2007-03-13 10:15:48 · answer #10 · answered by MiSz JaY 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋