In socialism and communism wealth is redistributed to needier people. What I dont get is that people that hate GW want socialism and then would WANT bush to be in charge or distributing wealth?
Isn't the problem with the idea of socialism and communsim (and facism) that politicians get to decide things about HUGE amounts of money?
Where do libs get off saying they want socialism but then say they hate BUSH. People like BUSH will be in power under THEIR system.
Will anyone raise there hand in favor of freedom instead?
2007-03-13 02:54:58 · 3 answers · asked by kent j 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
A world without socialism and without Bush? What a wonderful world it would be.
2007-03-13 03:00:36 · answer #1 · answered by Mark 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Most aren't honest enough to admit that they actually favor socialism. Given the lack of answers, they will not favor anything that in any way appears to support GWB. Therefore, even the libs who would not support socialism can't respond to your question b/c that would be too much in agreement with Bush. Those who support socialism can't respond b/c you throw the curve ball of Him being in charge of that government. Brilliant question!
2007-03-13 10:41:38 · answer #2 · answered by Whootziedude 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I hate to inform you pal, but the antiBush fanbase is much larger and more diverse than you think.
2007-03-13 10:03:15 · answer #3 · answered by Crystal Blue Persuasion 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋