The Mobster/Mafia gangs of the 1920s-1940s or the current LA based gangs that have spread through the country? Or even in comparison the groups of cowboys in the Wild West/ or Wild West outlaws? Which I know technically the Wild West cowboys weren't out for blood, they were more so really doing a gov't job of settlement. The Wild West was simply an adjective saying that they didn't have the same jurisdiction order that the established east had.
2007-03-13 02:54:03 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
Good point slinda.
2007-03-13 03:14:58 · update #1
Why do you think (your choice) is more dangerous over the other?
2007-03-13 06:11:50 · update #2
The modern gangs, they're far more dangerous.
2007-03-13 04:35:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Government sanctioned violence is always the worse because it is capable of going a lot further and lasting a lot longer. All of the activities involved in settling this country and wrestling the West from the hands of plains Indians is a lot worse than the mafia or LA gangs which were and are forces to work undercover.
2007-03-13 10:02:17 · answer #2 · answered by slinda 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
all gangs are useless and a waste of knowing
2007-03-13 10:03:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
AND YOUR POINT IS?, SORRY I JUST DON'T GET IT!!!!!
2007-03-13 09:59:39 · answer #4 · answered by Billie R 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋