will there or can there ever be a united world government?

Answer 1

If a world government comes to power, there are 2 possibilities for it's formation:

1) A united international government that is formed after real world peace has been achieved; brought about by understanding, unity and trust; were exploitation and the appallingly bad distribution of wealth are truly abolished.

This is not in the interest of the global corporations that currently run western governments as it would mean a very serious reduction in their wealth and power.

2) A superpower literally seizes control and creates a corporate dictatorship under the disguise of democracy (a bigger version of what we have now)

This is more likely to be the outcome if superpowers and huge corporations are left unchecked. However, the resistance to a global takeover is still huge and will probably continue to take the form of guerrilla warfare and terrorism.

Answer 2

Unfortunately probably so. There is a large group of people that are hellbent on making this happen one way or another.

It seems many people in here are pretty gullible.

here are some famous quotes from the 20th century from some of the globalists. there are many more on the internet

"We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether
World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent." -- Statement made before the
United States Senate on Feb. 7, 1950 by James Paul Warburg ("Angel" to and active in the
United World Federalists), son of Paul Moritz Warburg, nephew of Felix Warburg and of Jacob
Schiff, both of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. which poured millions into the Russian Revolution through
James' brother Max, banker to the German government - See the Siss?on Report


"The term Internationalism has been popularized in recent years to cover an interlocking financial,
political, and economic world force for the purpose of establishing a World Government. Today
Internationalism is heralded from pulpit and platform as a 'League of Nations' or a 'Federated Union' to
which the United States must surrender a definite part of its National Sovereignty. The World
Government plan is being advocated under such alluring names as the 'New International Order,' 'The
New World Order,' 'World Union Now,' 'World Commonwealth of Nations,' 'World Community,' etc. All
the terms have the same objective; however, the line of approach may be religious or political according
to the taste or training of the individual." -- excerpt from A Memorial to be Addressed to the House of
Bishops and the House of Clerical and Lay Deputies of the Protestant Episcopal Church in General
Convention (October 1940)


"[The New World Order] cannot happen without U.S. participation, as we are the most
significant single component. Yes, there will be a New World Order, and it will force the United
States to change it's perceptions." -- Henry Kissenger, World Affairs Council Press Conference,
Regent Beverly Wilshire Hotel , April 19th 1994



"The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is the American Branch of a society which originated in England ... (and) ... believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule
established."-- Professor of History Carroll Quigley, Georgetown University, in his book "Tragedy and Hope".


"The New World Order will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down...but in the end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal assault." CFR member Richard Gardner, writing in the April l974 issue of the CFR's journal, Foreign Affairs.



"How to Achieve The New World Order" Title of book excerpt by Henry Kissinger, in Time magazine (March 1994)

Answer 3

I think it's unlikely. Although throughout history there has been a trend towards bigger states (i.e. from families to villages to tribes to countries), and the 19th century saw the creation of countries like Germany and Italy from many states. However when countries get too big you tend to get separatists, who either feel the need for their own identity, or feel one government can't represent well a whole area.
For example in the United Kingdom, although Europe is getting stronger there are also strong movements towards moving power towards different regions.
As the world differs so much in cultures and in the needs, I can't see anyone supporting this.
I think it unlikely there will ever be the political will to form a world government, perhaps the best chance would be if we were at war with aliens and had a common enemy (that wasn't really a serious suggestion).

Answer 4

No there won't be and no there shouldnt be. Can you imagine countries like North Korea, Iran, and Russia sharing the same leader as the United States? What I foresee are "unions" much like the European Union. Over the next 20-40 years I see the countries uniting to create an "african union" a "southeast asia union" a "middle eastern union" and possibly an "asia major union". All will be established to have more influence over the global economy as a group, since individual countries won't have the single country power of the US.

Answer 5

No specific type of government will ever fulfill this type of extensive team of folk; if this have been to ever happen the government would not merely must be fascist, protecting all people in examine by ability of ability of scare strategies, yet have additionally risen from an quite, very useful u . s . a . whose movements, nevertheless ambitious, do no longer turn the heads of alternative international locations. If this have been to in a roundabout way happen then the inevitable worldwide conflict 3 following such stimuli could be a civil one.

Answer 6

No. Not even country governments seem to be able to agree let alone world government.

Answer 7

no!!it wont happen..they've tried that in the history during the days of alieghiere, the world monarchy..and didnt freud implied in his theory of personality about the super-ego?the super-ego implied in the politics is that, you shouldnt identify urself with the rest of the world coz that would mean danger..everyone have different cultures and belief...and a orld government would be impossible if that would be the case..

Answer 8

Not unless it will be ran exactly like the US Government. And I image that others would not be so willing to change from their present mode of Government either.

Answer 9

It would be nice, but i seems less and less likely with the break up of the Soviet Union Yugoslavia. Even the UK is devolving power away from centralised government.

Answer 10

No. Human nature is Greed, therefore one country will always want more than the other. Religion will also prevent a world union even though we are all supposed to live in harmony!