Is not the new nomenclature of gandhigiri as insult to followers of gandhiwad who took the preacing of gandhij

Question

WHY WE INDIAN DID NOT REACT TO DEGRADTION OF GANDHIISM OR GANDHIVAD BY THE E MEDIA NOMENCLATURE RECENLY CIRCULATED AND ADVERTIZEDAS GANDHIGIRI
THE GIRI SUFFIX IS NOT USED FOR ANY GOOD SOCIAL CAUSE

Answer 1

Gandhi was a DISGRACE. Indians, and especially Hindus should be ashamed of him. I hope and pray to god that nobody like him is ever born in India or in Hinduism. The only thing that he cared about was his place in history. He had no practical concern about the welfare of his hindu people and he did not care that his policies would ruin the lives of thousands and thousands of hindus. He was an overley idealistic, overley utopian man with no practical saviness. He lacked any dignity, any integrity, any virtue, any godliness or any masculitnity. On top of that he used to dress like a tramp. He must have been gay. Indians should use him as an example of what NOT TO BE like rather than What to be like.

Answer 2

Call it gandhigiri or gandhivaadi, the principles are the same. So why react. You however are running away from the concept of first of those principles. It ways, oppose injustice on people, on society. Never did the principles declare anywhere that we have to fight for names too. even the term gandhivaadi was coined after his death. Till he lived it was just satyagraha movement.

All the best...

:-)

Answer 3

If one looks deeper onto the intent of the content and not be too critical of the mode utilised it shall appear more positive.
Netagiri is another one...............

Answer 4

OPINIONS VARY