in the beginning...
instead at the end, where the soldiers were running and seemed alot more effective?
is it because a change of strategy overall in the union or something else?
thank you.
2007-03-12
23:42:28
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Moore55
4
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ History
response to the marching strategy.....yes, so soldiers wouldnt get tired when they're close but whats the point of they're all blown up or gunned down by the time they get close?
i will never understand why back then they fought this way, why not separate and use guerilla techniques?
2007-03-13
04:57:04 ·
update #1