English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-12 21:53:19 · 7 answers · asked by art_raiders 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Bryan, I not Republican or Democrat.
I am was born in 1950's, I have voted for both parties and a third. But, Republicans tend to blame fault, instead of looking in mirror.

2007-03-12 22:28:57 · update #1

7 answers

He was the last Democrat president. There were problems in his presidency the same as there are problems in current presidency. In politics when one side presents criticisms the other side will counter with criticisms of their own. Some talk about Mr. Clinton is legitimate as some policies his administration created are still effecting life today. Others are just gratuitous bashing. The main reason though is that many Clinton supporters absolutely refuse to believe that Mr. Clinton violated the law and frankly these blind defenses which seek to ignore the facts offend many. The same will be true of Mr. Bush. How long will Democrats bring him up after his tenure ends, especially considering many are still talking about Nixon, Reagan and Bush on a regular basis. This is just politics.

Edit: I am not a Republican or Democrat either, I am a Conservative Independent. I can go you one better, I voted for Clinton in his second term. If you think that Republicans are the only ones guilty of the type of behavior you describe you need to get out more because both sides are pretty equally guilty in this area. Both sides defend their heroes while attacking the opposition. Take these Clinton questions you are talking about, Republicans state the obvious facts which are that the man lied. Democrats counter attack by denying the charges and claiming that Republicans just didn't like the fact that he had an affair. Look I am not really trying to challenge you, but your points are trying to indict one side, while completely absolving the other. If you are an independent trying looking at both sides equally in the future. It might lead you to some different conclusions about your statements. You might even see how one sided they are.

2007-03-12 22:14:42 · answer #1 · answered by Bryan 7 · 0 0

They still remember when they bombarded Clinton with emails and he punished them. Clinton did not know how to read and had to have all the emails translated. Let's let bygones be bygones! They probably remember full medical insurance too, which Hillary was responsible for.

We dont practice the Law of Venus and "hold down a member of the familial unit and see if the crime stops." His wife Hillary might be able to restore the medical benefits we had, bring down the price of housing, and improve things and should not be blamed for Bill running off with everyone who sent him an email.

2007-03-13 02:16:42 · answer #2 · answered by Chatty82 3 · 0 0

Ross Perot had a brilliant impact. He certainly took away quite some conservative votes. yet there have been different motives. As Clinton's slogan pronounced, "that's the financial device stupid". The financial device grew to become into in a modest recession, yet no longer somewhat undesirable. the autumn of the Soviet empire probable slowed protection spending, that would have had some consequence on the financial device. The cellular and internet industries had no longer taken off yet (and those industries fueled the financial device interior the Clinton era). there have been no much less costly chinese language products to gasoline consumerism. And raising taxes would not help the financial device. "study my lips, no new taxes". It would not help to get caught in a brilliant lie. Conservatives abhore taxes and that's the Republican base. Bush grew to become into way out of touch with what an customary American grew to become into on the time. He characterised the middle classification as earning $200K/12 months back then. He might have meant that's how lots somebody who graduated interior the midst of his classification at Yale regulation college makes. Who knows? He grew to become into out of touch with Joe six %.. finally, between the biggest secrets and methods approximately Bush's loss grew to become into that he grew to become into delicate on communism. because of the fact the Soviet Union collapsed, Bush did each thing he ought to to prop up the Gorbachov regime. What do assume from the former director of theCIA? He grew to become into going to omit his previous buds. because of the fact the former Soviet republics declared their independence, the u . s . a . grew to become into constantly between the final countries to renowned those new self reliant states. Refugees from the former Soviet Union that now lived in theUSA have been appalled. This grew to become right into a block that had voted ninety% Republican because of the fact they seen the Dems as delicate on communism. Bush lost all of those votes. i understand, my kinfolk is a Soviet refugee kinfolk. I voted for Clinton because of the fact I hated George Bush for his betrayal.

2016-10-18 06:23:20 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Self-brainwashing. Same reason any and all political followers will always trash the previous opposing administration to somehow excuse the wrongdoing of their current leaderboard.

Politics is a joke.

2007-03-12 22:12:53 · answer #4 · answered by Griever 2 · 1 0

Clinton was popular with the Americans despite the slander he created. His government brought peace within the State and unity with the rest of the world. His public charisma matched up to President JF Kennedy.

2007-03-12 22:05:59 · answer #5 · answered by ADELINE W 1 · 1 2

Probably the same reason some deocrats still bring up Reagan.

2007-03-12 21:56:28 · answer #6 · answered by DOOM 7 · 3 2

It's easier than admitting their GOP spawn is a miserable failure.

2007-03-12 21:58:04 · answer #7 · answered by ♥austingirl♥ 6 · 0 3

fedest.com, questions and answers