If America hasn't nuked another country in over 60 years, do you think we should do it?

Question

Which country should we bomb and why?

Iran was a good one...how about France, as they seem to be allied with Iran?

Answer 1

Charity begins from home. Start from washington ot NYC

Answer 2

fragina noypa or vagina- whatever you are, you're so phuckin' ignorant!!
IRAN HAS ZERO NUKES!!!!!!
Even your retarded president only suspects that Iran would like to produce nukes,and is several years away from being able to build one if it truly wanted to.
Despite the 1979 hostage debacle, for which I hate Iran, the fact is Shiite Iran has never attacked any country and is the most democratic muslim country in the mideast except perhaps, for lebanon. Shiites are peaceful. It's part of mideast culture to act macho and talk smack about the European colony of Israel. They just want to produce electricity via nuclear power plants.
No, the usa shouldn't nuke anybody. If we did, then the world should do the right thing and nuke the red states for having their inbred heads up their cornholes.
Clearly, the yankees won the battle, but lost the war.

Answer 3

enable's say if the US nukes North Korea, it may bring about a nuclear war because of the fact they have China and maybe Russia (undecided) as their closest allies. Or if the US nuke Iran or any Muslim united states of america, you would be able to or won't have the whole Muslim international on you. merely like the others stated, it relies upon in the event that they have allies, while US nuked Japan no person cared with regard to the justification or retaliation of it when you consider that Japan did no longer had any allies.

Answer 4

Yes

which country: Venezuala

why: Hugo Chavez

Answer 5

Yes having nuclear weapons at your disposal must come with heavy responsibilities and the knowledge to use it as a last resort. It should never be used to deter hostility from us, we can solve that with other military means. Survivors of our decision to use nuclear (atomic) weapons suffered a great deal, and no-one should kill a multitude because of one person. We should be much more civilized and think of the innocent that will also die.


TO THE WAND >>> Thanks for the correction of its name atomic bomb, but even a smart person like you would know that it harnesses the nuclear power we speak of. Instead of blowing hot air GO STUDY !

Answer 6

Only if the US is attacked by a state-sponsored terrorist attack within our own borders or if the survival of Israel is at stake. If one of those two actions ever occurs, all bets should be off the table because I would put possible nuclear weapons use as a military option. I would never say never because a nuclear deterrent is the greatest defensive shield we have, just ask Gorbachev and the former Soviet Union military leadership.

Answer 7

I like the idea of telling the muslem world that for each terror act we will nuke one muslim country till they get the message that we will not put up with their warped way of thinking and that we don't want to be muslims as well.
Lets put it simply if terrorists get hold of a bomb do you really think it would be a weapon of last restort

Answer 8

That is just about your mentality. Nuke them or shoot them and claim it was freindly fire.You lot should be drowned at birth.Other peoples lives mean nothing to you. you are bully boy scum. Let's see how big and hard you are and come to a foreign city and say something like that .

Answer 9

America has never nuked a country. The 2 bombs dropped on Japan were atomic bombs, not nuclear.

Answer 10

As long as the US is ready to be nuked back, and it will be by more than one country. So they should BEWARE!!! Just ask the UN.

Answer 11

while it might be cathartic, I just can't see it happening. The U.S. has mustered enough technology, I think, that it can inflict fairly damaging surgical strikes on intended targets.

The nuke scenario is going the way of secure nuclear power, not nuclear armament.

Well, we can all hope anyway.