It seems they dont have good ideals to grow only good ideals for crazy matches to get there wreslters hurt.
2007-03-12 18:30:13 · 8 answers · asked by mike c 3 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
No, they are not going out of business. They don't travel like WWE yet because they are still small and growing and need to build up their audience before branching out. The reason they tape is because of costs ALOT of money to do a live show every year and right now, there's better places they can spend the money. I think they're moving too fast really, you get big by taking little steps, not by jumping.
2007-03-12 18:35:31 · answer #1 · answered by Prime Time™©® 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
dude u need to understand tna is only 4.5 yrs old compare to wwe which is in the business for more then 25 yrs
you should know that for about 10 yrs of wwe's existence
wwe held raw in a new york city bingo hall and they never really had any concept of house shows
back then but as they started to became popular and started to make money they went ahead and did all those tours
however the point is tna is relatively new company in the business and it takes time for a company to establised, did u hear mtv came up with wsx and it ran on tv for about 4 weeks but they are planning to cancel wsx all together, so the point is its not easy to run a pro wrestling business and wwe is the biggest and the largest wrestling promotion in the world n tna hasnt done bad atall lately, they got good ratings for impact n did well with the ppv buyrates and they do hold live house shows 3 times in a month around the country
2007-03-13 01:44:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
TNA are currently a loss-making company, they still arent turning a profit, however their creditors are happy with the long time business plan, so they are not going out of business.
TNA dont do live shows like the WWE because they cant attract the crowds to pay the expenses. On top of this, TNA already cannot afford to pay their stars travel expenses - they are expected to pay their own to tapings, there owuld be trouble if thery tried to make them pay even more.
2007-03-13 01:39:35 · answer #3 · answered by theusualsuspect88 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you meant ideas? The reason they don't travel as much and only wrestle on a limited schedule is that's how they draw some of the talent in. Angle and Sting are two who would not be wrestling if it wasn't for the TNA schedule. They have one PPV a month and only two other shows (they tape two weeks at a time). That gives a guy like Sting plenty of time with his family. Gives a guy like Angle time to rest from injuries. The schedule will also most likely land Big Show too. It give other guys the like to wrestle more shows the freedom to work for indy promotions and Ring of Honor. That's why they do it like they do and its also cheaper, not much travel expenses.
2007-03-13 03:14:59 · answer #4 · answered by Jayson Kane 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
TNA is a smaller budget company that cant paid arena owner money to do show where as WWE can. They operate in Florida. I just heard TNA is going to have electric cage match between LAX and Team 3 D.
2007-03-13 01:34:27 · answer #5 · answered by Ming P 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tna is on they edge of going out of business. You know its bad when you can go watch the show for free. They dont even charge people to get in there or else no one would even go watch it. If your product is not good enough to put buying buts in the seats then its just a matter of time before you go out of business. Besides I know you and were both from ohio. Tune into ohio valley wrestling its better than tna anyways.
2007-03-13 01:36:37 · answer #6 · answered by Stephanie 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Two reasons
1: Jeff Jarrett
2: Vince Russo/Jim Cornette/whoever is writing this crap.
there is a ton of talent on TNA, its a shame.
2007-03-13 01:36:38 · answer #7 · answered by bubba429@verizon.net 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
tna is for losers
2007-03-13 02:17:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋