do you agree or not that they should do it?
2007-03-12 18:25:31 · 14 answers · asked by PROUD TO BE A LIBERAL TEEN! 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Should they sue? In the couple of cases I've seen, the individuals were specifically racially profiled and then excluded based solely on their religious status.
That's unacceptable.
2007-03-12 18:29:38 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 3⤊ 7⤋
The point of the courts is to decide issues that aren't clear. If a court accepts the suit (finds "grounds"), then by all means, they should go forward.
I hope that US Airways was justified in what it did, I hate to see people treated wrongly. But if they were wrong, I hope the Imams most certainly win a judgment.
2007-03-12 18:33:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
They bought one way tickets and they were praying before they boarded. The airline made the right decision. Let the Imams sue. They will lose.
2007-03-12 19:03:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't agree with the Imams suing the airlines for removing them. I hope they will not win, because if so it would weaken our security. They should have the right to detain anyone who acts suspiciously.
2007-03-12 19:22:39 · answer #4 · answered by JudiBug 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If they're on the no fly list, then the airline is required to not allow them on the flight. If not, the pilot reserves the right to refuse service to any passenger he feels might endanger the passengers and crew.
2007-03-12 19:15:43 · answer #5 · answered by DOOM 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
while there are cases where people are being discranted aginst I didndt see ant evidence of that.They took actions that apaered suspicious.
Note i said actions not action bc they did several thing that made them a target of suspicion such as loud prayin, moving to different seats in the plane,which was aimilar to where configuration of were the hijacker
of 911 did as well as some of the stement they made on the plane.While they could explain therir actions the airline had every right to remove them and did so.I doubt they can win
2007-03-12 18:37:42 · answer #6 · answered by the_maskedtoaster 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
i do no longer recognize the status of their cleanliness, i.e., "grimy, filthy". in spite of the indisputable fact that, i think of they are pushing the element and being particularly insensitive. regardless of each thing, radical Islamists have and proceed to dedicate acts of terrorism and loudly annouce their wish for the death and destruction of united statesa. and its voters. Is there quite any reason to no longer protest the habit of the Imams on that airplane? regrettably, until Muslims international extensive take a sturdy outward stance against their radical fellow Muslims, they'll proceed to reason non-muslims to view them with a suspicious eye.
2016-10-02 01:04:00 · answer #7 · answered by wisniowski 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well it is a private airline, and I would think they have the right of who can ride on their equipment. It would be a hard sell in the court room to be honest.
2007-03-12 18:33:58 · answer #8 · answered by leonard bruce 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Should we create a special exception for Moslem's. All Moslem's are not terrorist but all the terrorist have been Moslems. When Chinese midgets fly our planes into our buildings and kill Americas then we should entertain the idea of looking at them when they board a plane.
2007-03-12 18:45:46 · answer #9 · answered by ohbrother 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Depends on the circumstances. He has the right to sue, jury has the right to find guilty or not guilty. Faux news has the right to report.
2007-03-12 18:30:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Are you kiddin Why are these people allowed into the US .Of course they should not be allowed on aircraft after what they done
2007-03-12 18:32:08 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋