It'll be like switching role where the man is the women and the women is the man.
2007-03-12 18:25:26 · 12 answers · asked by gambitleblanc 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
Sexual orientation is based on who you desire, not who you go out with or have sex with.
If a gay man goes out with a lesbian woman or has sex with her and desires her as a woman, I'd have to say he was bisexual, or at least had an exception in his homosexuality for her. Similarly for her.
However, I do know of some very queer, awesome people who identify as gay or lesbian, but still sleep with gay or lesbian members of the opposite sex. They call their sex "queer" rather than heterosexual because it's between two gay people. I know lesbian women who have, in a pinch, enjoyed topping gay men, even though they have no real attraction to men at all. I know gay men who have absolutely drooled over drag kings and whispered to them that "things probably all look the same from behind, right?".
Sexuality is hard to sit down and define. In the end, it comes down to the desires and motivations of the people acting. I'd wonder why they were so stubbornly sticking to gay and lesbian instead of 'bisexual', but they know better than me what they're doing.
I don't know that that has helped or just made things worse, but I hope it helped.
2007-03-12 19:26:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, they would both still be homosexual. Sexual orientation isn't dependent on the actual act of sex, but on who you are attracted to. And they wouldn't be switching roles, gay men do not play a woman in their relationships and lesbians don't play a man. The dynamics in homosexual relationships are more diverse than that.
As the poster above me said, there are people who do that and that particular practice is known as "queer sex".
2007-03-12 19:57:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why do you assume that Gay men are "women" and gay women are "men." You have a remarkable ignorance about this...leave the computer at once and get thee to the library. It is time to learn before hitting the keyboards.
2007-03-12 18:33:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It think of it has something to do with as we talk adult adult males's fantasies concerning with the ability to be with extra desirable than one woman at a time, no longer understanding that lesbians possibly would not decide on a guy in contact of their lovemaking interior the 1st place. I additionally think of that, at some subconscious point, adult adult males see watching women pass at it jointly (for what adult adult males think of, subconsciously, is for his or her very own exhilaration) as a fashion of adult adult males having a sort of power over women. this is purely an assumption nevertheless; i do no longer know what is going by way of as we talk mens' heads.
2016-12-19 04:16:16 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no he wouldn't be considered gay. This term is used only if a man is involved with a man...
Lesbians are girls involved with girls.
I see no reason why that man would still be called gay........
2007-03-12 18:35:15 · answer #5 · answered by faiza_t 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you are gay you are gay. It doesn't matter if you go out with, women gay or strait, or even if you are married.
2007-03-12 18:30:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
How do you figure it would be like switching roles?
2007-03-12 18:28:25 · answer #7 · answered by eschampion 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the problem is that th man is attracted to mena nd the woman is attracted to women.
2007-03-12 18:28:59 · answer #8 · answered by sexiinseductive 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So you're basically asking if the guy would like the girl because she acted like a guy and the girl would like the guy because he acted like a girl??
2007-03-12 18:29:46 · answer #9 · answered by The Sun Still Sleeps... 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
noo because hes going out with the opposite sex.
2007-03-12 18:42:23 · answer #10 · answered by oneandonlyness 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋