How would it be possible to do a computerized Monte Carlo simulation to prove the theorem, without implicit assumption of the law in the first place?
2007-03-12
17:44:59
·
2 answers
·
asked by
Scythian1950
7
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Mathematics
Drawing an imaginary target with 3 squares forming a right triangle and hitting it randomly and counting the times it lands on the squares is self-referential, i.e. circular.
2007-03-12
17:55:40 ·
update #1
SAH, your proposal already starts with "rignt triangles with known sides", which makes the proof a circular one. Is there a way to define orthgonality in abstract data space without appealing to Pythagorean theorem?
2007-03-14
08:22:54 ·
update #2
Alexander, I'm puzzled about something. If the "machine" does not "know" the distances, how does it determine that AB > AC? Image manipulation, so that effectively it's comparing photographs? Let me think on this for a while here.
2007-03-14
09:29:57 ·
update #3
Also, this is meant to be a "data space" analogue to the 5th Postulate problem. What does it mean to have "Euclidian geometry" in abstract data space? If a computer were to have an abstract sentience but not familiar with Euclidian geometry, where would it start?
2007-03-14
09:33:53 ·
update #4