Does Michael Moore's hypocrisy know no bound?

Question

Michael "Tons of Fun" Moore likes the guerilla ambush style of making documentaries...until it is used on him. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070311/ap_en_mo/film_manufacturing_dissent;_ylt=AqWS1_nBCwALQId4WtLyIe4DW7oF

Also quite telling is the fact that he neglected to mention that he DID speak at length with Roger Smith during the fillming of "Roger and Me".

I always knew Moore was a hypocritical lying weasel, but it's nice to see those facts exposed for all the world to see.

dstr: fascinating, but completely off-topic. Companies employ people, they do not adopt them.

blog: save it for someone who didn't grow up in the Flint area and witness Moore's lying up close.

dumbs: did you READ the article? That's what I thought. Dismissed.

Answer 1

What has he ever done that would lead you to assume he knows any boundaries? The man's entire existence is based on exploiting half truths. He is one of the most unethical people in this country.

Answer 2

It never fails. If any individual pricks the conservative bubble he must be investigated and disgraced, if not by fact then by innuendo and lie repeated incessantly.

Who cares what journalistic liberties the fat boy took? Is his spin on what happens in the USA accurate? Does he make the excessively righteous conservatives look over their shoulders when the buy cocaine and negotiate with teenage hookers?

Anybody who can vote for a warmongering zealot who shirked true military service is in no position to criticize marginal half truths, and nobody who voted again for a man who lied repeatedly about his reasons and evidence for starting a war can complain about outright falsehoods.

Michael Moore's true crime is that he has found in the GOP the intellectual and moral flaws that the godlike GOP have condemned ceaselessly in others. Of course he must be attacked. Of course his influence must be neutralized.

I suspect the attack campaign is merely a warm up for the real thing once the elections are going. It will be a relief once the primaries begin, and the GOP can slander actual candidates instead of media personalities.

Maybe once the debates start we can arrange an opening bout between Michael Moore and Rush Limbaugh. No matter who the real candidates are, those guys will be more interesting.

Answer 3

You know i ask the same question of president Bush each and every day. Bush is a lying weasel as well, so whats your point? Bush has the blood of many young men and women on his hands, has Michael Moore ever sent someone who was innocent to there death. Bush lied about the Iraq war, if you see past the crap you can see that it is all about the oil my friends, Bush could care less if the people of Iraq are free or not.

Answer 4

I thought Michael Moore did the documentary "Super Size Me" until I just saw the DVD cover on the shelf at Block Bluster.

Does Michael M. slant more or less than others these days? Say Rush L. supporting the War on Drugs while buying them illegally? Not really.

Hypocrisy must be contagious? So many seem to be afflicted.

Answer 5

in definitely certainty in case you study the e book in question "Do As I Say (no longer As I Do): Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy" by making use of Peter Schweizer, you spot that he dose no longer somewhat accuse Michael Moore of possessing shares interior the likes of Halliburton, etc. rather he alleges that there is a "beginning" that's controlled by making use of Moore and which in turn owns the shares in question. hence, rather than Moore possessing the shares immediately, they're owned by making use of this front company. In fairness to Moore the link is at superb tenuous - that's like asserting that in case you purchase shares in Ford autos and that they take place to very own particularly some shares in "Al Qaeda Inc" then you certainly very own shares in Al Qaeda too. in spite of no count in case you like or dislike the guy you ought to a minimum of be undemanding on your assessment, and that i think of any open-minded individual might probable locate him "no longer accountable" during this occasion. regardless of the undeniable fact that, it would be great if he additionally did likewise in his action pictures too.

Answer 6

Who cares whether Michael Moore wants to have a documentary made about him? And how does that have any relationship whatsoever to his own films? I think you're reaching.

Answer 7

He is not a hypocritical lying weasel . He is just as evasive as his subjects are when he is chasing after them looking for answers .
His appearance in someone else's documentary could have a negative effect on his earning potential .
He has some credibility but not much and someone could easily ruin it by attacking him and force him to spend millions to repair his public image .

Answer 8

Trust the message, not the messenger. Michael Moore is a rogue and deceitful man, but his movies tell mostly the truth.

Answer 9

Even if 10% of his movie about bush was true,a person like that should not be the leader of our country. What is it gonna take for you republicans to recognize truth and quit hiding behind your deception?????????The war is a prime example. He has no plan at all and never did. America is tired of being distracted by all the hopeless lies the republicans say. Name one thing in the last presidential debates that bush has done for our country. Social security is one example. Him and his friends have halliburton for their social security. But thanks. Thanks alot.

Answer 10

LMAO. Yes, he's a really good "documentary" filmmaker.

No wonder I didn't bother to watch the Oscars.