Why not increase taxes on alcohol?

Question

everyone wants to raise taxes on cigarettes, why not increase the taxes on alcohol. It causes more deaths, than 1 smoke.
Or is it because we have an over abundance of drunks running the country?

Answer 1

have you been reading all the news that the smoke nazis are causing these days? they want to ban smoking everywhere. all over the united states. anywhere and everywhere. and they are actually starting to get somewhere with their scare tactics that are not based on scientific FACT.

and so, the government listens and is beginning to allow all the smoke nazis to take charge, making all areas non smoking areas with no tolerance whatsoever of a smoker.

but have you noticed how addicted the government is to tobacco product taxes? it is not addicted to liquor taxes, but to cigarette taxes, isn't it?

quite a paradox, isn't it?

now then, who causes the most traffic fatalities? smokers or drinkers?

would smoke nazis rather get killed by a drunk driver or by POSSIBLY smelling smoke from a cigarette smoked outdoors, about 12 feet from them?

it seems to me that they'd far rather BELIEVE that they will die as a result of smelling secondhand smoke. and so, they bother the politicians. and the politicians listen to them.

but it would make more sense to tax the heck out of alcohol. if joe blow had to pay $1 for the glass of beer, plus an additional $3 for the tax on it, then he'd think twice before having another beer, wouldn't he?

the reason that the government doesn't tax on alchohol as much as tobacco is because the "insurance companies will take care of that."

i'm sick of the smoke nazis dictating to others that they should not and cannot smoke. i grow weary how so many of them these days see a smoker 20 feet away from them on the street and immediately put their hand up over their nose. they did not do that 5 years ago. they didn't do it 10 years ago. but it is one of those "popular" things to do these days, isn't it?

but they do not think about how many businessmen that run restaurants are suffering as a result of their bans on smoking. when that businessman suffers, he has less money to spend within the society. therefore, fewer dollars go to the companies that the smoke nazis work for. and then those companies suffer.

i'll not go on, however, i find it grossly unfair that the percentage of price of taxes on tobacco is SO DARNED HIGHER than it is on alcohol, when alcohol is a far more serious problem within our society, period.

ps: when these news stories are run, about the towns going no smoking, they ask from input from the readers. more than 85% respond that such action is another form of unwanted and unnecessary government control. less than 15% support such laws. and yet, the GOVERNMENT IS ADDICTED TO TOBACCO TAXES!

Answer 2

I consistently think of that's laughable. worldwide places like France that have low tax on alcohol have little or no binge eating (alcohol isn't a luxury merchandise and subsequently infants are pronounced around it and have a greater normalised relationship to it). extra as tax on drink interior the united kingdom has greater effective binge eating has greater effective. If i replaced into in government and attempting to decrease binge eating i be attentive to what i could do - hint no longer enhance tax on drink!

Answer 3

Alcohol and cigarettes are know as the "poor mans tax" why not think of something else to tax? Say......Rich people & credit unions.

Answer 4

yes you are right. the only reason why the government does not increase taxes on alcohol is , because of powerful liquor lobby.

Answer 5

They're already high enough as it is. And I doubt that alcohol causes appreciably more deaths than tobacco.