Syracuse got snubbed, but Drexel did not. I dont even know why they are in the conversation of teams getting snubbed. They lost to poor teams like Rider and William and Mary, did not play any ranked teams, only 4 teams that they played made the tournament, they had a poor schedule, a bad RPI, and finished 4th in a mid major conference. The only reason people even consider Drexel in this conversation is cause they beat Nova and Syracuse.
2007-03-12 16:38:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Drexel did. If you watched Syracuse you saw how week they are. They are the same type of team as Duke and just because of their coaches and history, people look at them as elites. They have the chance to be an elite team in the future, but not now. Compare Drexels record to Duke's or Arkansas, they're not even close, I think Kansas St. and Drexel should be in, and Arkansas Duke should be out. And Syracuse, ya'll are right where you belong.
2007-03-12 22:54:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Peter B 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Drexel - Yes
Syracuse - No
Appalachian State - Yes
Those two should be in. They should take the places of Arkansas and Stanford, who should have never been in the tournament in the first place.
2007-03-12 22:58:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by linus_van_pelt_4968 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the words that go a long with the NCAA tournament are all funny: bubble, snub, cinderella...funny
I don't think they got snubbed, the NIT is a fine tournament, just ask Michigan they play hard in it each year.
2007-03-12 23:20:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by cancerman 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think Syracuse did and I think they deserved to be in, but I don't know much about Drexel
2007-03-12 22:43:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by zaroo21 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Air Force got snubbed the biggest ...
2007-03-12 22:50:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Michael E 2
·
0⤊
0⤋