English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Read recently that some Law Makers want to issue death certificates for aborted children. Never born, but has died. Is this acceptable?

2007-03-12 13:37:44 · 12 answers · asked by pszch 3 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

12 answers

Still born babies are issued birch certificates. Why would murdered babies be any differant?

2007-03-12 13:41:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Lawmakers can require death certificates if they want. That's a purely political gesture, with no inherently meaning at all.

But if lawmakers want to mandate paperwork and have it labeled "death certificate" there's nothing to stop them.

But calling it a death certificate does not the change the medical facts, and does not affect current abortion laws.

2007-03-12 20:49:57 · answer #2 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1 1

It's not going to happen. It's just more spinning, trying to get the religious right on another moral issue in time for the next presidential election.

2007-03-12 20:43:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

well actually there was life its just that some people don't like to accept it..

I just don't like abortion in general.. its murder..

I don't know about the death certificate thing.. its screaming bloody murder

2007-03-12 20:42:17 · answer #4 · answered by weirdkid 2 · 1 0

It's never going to happen. It's just another ploy by the shyster politicians to yank the chains of the antiabortionist.

2007-03-12 20:46:32 · answer #5 · answered by Crystal Blue Persuasion 5 · 0 0

This is not acceptable.

These law makers definitely lack common sense.

2007-03-12 20:42:05 · answer #6 · answered by Living In Korea 7 · 1 0

Just another sneaky way to push an agenda on the citzens.

2007-03-12 20:42:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Of course it's acceptable.

It's a life when you want the baby... so why isn't it a life when it's inconvenient?

2007-03-12 20:45:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I don't see why not. They did live at some point, though they had been still in the womb.

2007-03-12 20:50:22 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 1 1

yes.

2007-03-12 20:45:16 · answer #10 · answered by mistrhistre 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers