2007-03-12 13:03:15 · 14 answers · asked by james B 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Nope. It means they are exercising their right to free speech. Bush & Cheney believe dissention is unAmerican. However, the First admendment was in place a long time prior to these fools.
2007-03-12 13:19:09 · answer #1 · answered by kenny J 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Sr wasn't however the 1st declare is rather real! Sr. is on the board of the carysle group alnong with Bin Ladden! particular Bush/Cheney provide convenience and notion to the enemy on a regular basis , that's why Bin Ladden continues to be unfastened 5 a million/2 years later
2016-11-24 23:22:21 · answer #2 · answered by ecker 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush and Cheney don't speak for themselves, and neither do any of the democrats. They all speak for the New World Oder.
So the answer to you question is yes... if you are not supporting the New World Order, than you are not only giving comfort to the enemy - You are the enemy.
Section 802 of the Patriot act states:
‘‘the term ‘domestic terrorism’ means activities that—
‘‘involve acts dangerous to human life that are
a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or
of any State;
So, basically Speeding or Jaywalking is defined as "domestic terrorism". because they 1. involve acts dangerous to human life - and 2. are
a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or
of any State;
Yeah... What a "patriot" bill!
Resist the media gatekeepers of the New World Order like Sean Colmes and Rush Limbaugh who fill you with distracting propaganda. Resist the lie machine. DOWN WITH THE SATANIC NEW WORLD ORDER!
Power to the Resistance!
2007-03-12 13:23:23 · answer #3 · answered by Christian Paragon 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
When people believes that their troops cannot win, we already lost! Their disagreements only shorten the time for enemies to achieve victories. It is inevitable. We must say that they do their best to limit the death of our soldiers in a losing war rather than help our enemies to kill our soldiers!
2007-03-12 13:56:20 · answer #4 · answered by holyfire 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No they are disagreeing with the Enemy itself.
2007-03-12 14:06:40 · answer #5 · answered by Dr.O 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's not the disagreements that bother people, its the way people disagree that gives aid and comfort to the enemy.
2007-03-12 13:08:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Debate is fine. But when people spew that Bush lied or he's doing this for oil then yes. Your giving comfort to the enemy.
2007-03-12 13:07:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
No, it means that they are exercising their constitutional rights to disagree with the "President and VP". Someone should tell Dick that just because he says it, doesn't mean it's true.
2007-03-12 13:18:56 · answer #8 · answered by kvcar2 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely not. Though they would have people believe that. Disagreement is good. Truth should prevail.
2007-03-12 13:10:41 · answer #9 · answered by margherita 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Not necessarily....probably not. That isn't to say that some liberals aren't, but the two aren't mutually exclusive.
2007-03-12 13:07:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋