wwe is better in my opinion because they started wrestling TNA wouldn't exsist if wwe was never there. Tna can't even have 30 munite matches and if there is a 30 minute match the match sucks anyway WWE all the way
2007-03-12 09:20:36 · 15 answers · asked by chads the wwe 1 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
THANK YOU! Finally someone who sees the truth. Tna sucks crap and all they do is copy the wwe. Kurt angle vs christian cage, we've seen that match a dozen times in wwe and its tna's main event. Oh, and if they did have a 30 minute match that would take up there whole time slot.TNA SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-03-12 09:26:44 · answer #1 · answered by BOB 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Another fool:
Read what i posted before about tna and wwe
and lmao WWE doesnt have better storylines......TNA takes more time in building their story lines and gets you more into it however with WWE storylines they are all usually story lines from the 80's 90's etc. And you can usually tell the outcome of how the storyline will end in WWE
NEXT: They have a completely different style of wrestling
WWE is more slow and seems more plan(I know that the outcome is planned but the match isnt) however TNA is awesome you never know whats going to happen you get high flyers going every where
TNA PPVS: Tna has a better Pay per View than WWE thats why Vince Mcmahon has banned single show payperviews eg Raw has its own paper view ETC
AND BEFORE YOU SAY IM BIASED I HAVE WATCHED WWE SINCE 1990 SO I KNOW EVERYTHING TO DO ABOUT IT....ALL IM SAYING IS THAT AFTER WWF TURNED TO WWE ITS BEEN GOING DOWNHILL AND TNA ARE GOING UP AND UP.
2007-03-12 09:29:56 · answer #2 · answered by Tna "We are Wrestling" 1 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I agree, the WWE makes the other wrestlign companies able to work. Plus if the WWE bought out TNA everyone would be mad because then there would be only one show that they could watch. WWE mankes every thing work out. Yes TNA might be as big as WWE one day, but they are not there yet. And if they try to buy ou the WWE, the wrestlers from both sides will have a field day. So I am WWE all the way.
Julie C
2007-03-12 09:36:18 · answer #3 · answered by julie c~actress and WWE&TNA_FAN! 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
My opinion on that's tna replaced into sturdy up until eventually hogan and biscoff got here in , the corporation went downhill badly yet earlier they confirmed up tna replaced into awsome, as of wwe , pg era , form extention , undesirable tale strains , adequate suggested , both suck those days
2016-12-01 21:40:12 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they both r good but im pretty sure tna would have started wrestlin if wwe didnt and the tna wrestlers wrestle better then the wwe wrestlersbut wwe got some alright stuff truely if ur a wrestlin fan ushould like both of them cause they all entertain u
2007-03-12 09:37:38 · answer #5 · answered by Day 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I'm WWE all the way. Have you ever noticed that TNA gets all of the WWE's rejects. The WWE fired Jeff Hardy, so he went to TNA, then the first chance the WWE gave him to come back he jumped on it.
2007-03-12 09:26:41 · answer #6 · answered by Twilight Lover 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I watch both and have to agree with you that the WWE is MUCH BETTER than Tna...Tna just borrows all the storylines and plots from the WWE anyway...
2007-03-12 09:25:20 · answer #7 · answered by ryboyin 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
TNA means Totally Nothing Accomplished!!!
2007-03-12 10:06:56 · answer #8 · answered by jimmideon49 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
TNA Rules!
WWE Sucks!
For your information, WWE didn't start wrestling.
NWA & AWA & promotions like that started wrestling.
NWA & AWA existed long before WWE existed at all!
If you prefer WWE, then you are a big BS fan.
TNA is innovative & unpredictable!
WWE is boring! WWE does the same matches every week!
TNA Rules!!!!!!!!!!
WWE Sucks!!!!!!!!
2007-03-12 09:48:29 · answer #9 · answered by BKW 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋
wwe rocks ,tna sucks
2007-03-12 12:34:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋