Ann Coulter is an outspoken conservative writer with an acerbic wit. Once in awhile Ann opens her month before her brain is in gear as she did when she used the derogative term "******" and John Edwards in the same sentence.
Oops the term above "******" rhymes with maggot.
2007-03-12 09:19:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Flyboy 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I Hate Ann Coulter
2017-01-16 11:00:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ann Coulter is a conservative writer. She likes taking gigs to speak and express a specific view, a view a lot of conservative secretly agree with. By 2040, more than half the American population will be hispanic, whites will be the minority. She speaks how she hates it where MSNNBC is all excited about the browning of America, and what s more done to control the ethnic content of America to stay completely Anglo. She is against the change of culture. She will claim she is not a white supremacist, but her rhetoric is completely indicative of a white supremacist. Before 1492, there were no white people or Anglo dominant culture - Anglo culture was forced upon, native american lands stolen, and the Native American people s subjugated, made subserviant, and literally sidelined into "reservations" where they re laws and customs and their ideals are not respected. She has the gull to complain how Anglo America is losing power, but it s ironic now that what s happening to Anglo America now, happened to Native Americans more than 200 years ago. Now they know how it feels like, and they better get used to it. Change is inevitable, and is constant. This was not their land, this was not their home - they stole all of this from native american tribal nations by massacring them. They have no right to tell the rest of us that we re not welcome here. The Native American tribes that are still around have more right and more say than the US government ever will, and that s because they were here first. If they don t want to be sidelined like the Native Americans, they are going to need to start negotiating and be willing to allow all minorities a say and a spot at the big table, otherwise - there will be a point where they will find themselves at the little kids table in the near future, and with no recourse.
2016-07-25 16:21:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mike 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
She didn't just call John Edwards gay, she called him a f*ggot. Even the conservative group she was speaking to was offended by her and got fed up with her childish namecalling, so that should tell you something about where she's standing.... way off to the side by herself.
She's a cheap shot artist and a hypocritical conservative writer. For instance, she ripped the widows of some of the victims of 9-11 as tragedy whores who are supposedly making a living on of being 9-11 widows. yet she's written article after article and books about 9-11 and made money off of it, but somehow that's "different".
http://slannder.homestead.com/
2007-03-12 09:29:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by bodinibold 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
Ann Coulter is a conservative writer/pundit. To be totally honest with you, she lost her sister in 9/11, and I don't think she's really moved past the shock of that. Before 9/11, she was excellent at debating her point and was regularly featured on Mancow's Morning Madhouse. However, it seems like the loss of her sister was the ultimate indictment of liberal ideology (in her eyes), and her point has now moved to, "I'm right, you're wrong, leave me the *#$% alone!"
2007-03-12 09:23:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ryan O 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
She makes use of "lack of knowledge" to down grade people like she make remarks about the women who lost there husbans on 9-11. Far right wing mouth piece she the female version of Rush Limbaugh.
2007-03-13 01:09:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I like Ann Coulter. The left wing extremists hate her with a fury because she mercilessly exposes the illogic and silliness of their left wing agendas and she writes better than any of the people on their side every could hope to. Read 'How To Talk To a Liberal' for a very interesting and entertaining read. At least she documents what she says in her books.
2007-03-12 09:22:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
6⤋
Because she's the lowest excuse for a female on the planet; uses her God-given intelligence to spread hate, bigotry and misinformation among morons who pay to hear her outrageousness.
2007-03-12 09:22:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by worldinspector 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
She is one of those morons who like to blame all the ills of this country on liberals and she uses controversy to sell books and keep her name in the papers. She is no different than Michael Moore, just on the other side of the political spectrum.
2007-03-12 09:24:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by go avs! 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
She is an attractive lady who provokes dialogue.
She puts herself out in public view, and is very opinionated.
All of those qualities makes her open to criticism, especially from people who hate her.
I take the negative publicity with a grain of salt. She knows that even bad publicity is good for becoming a recognized face in the news.
2007-03-12 09:23:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by gg 7
·
1⤊
4⤋