--------------------------------------------------------------------------------?

Question

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Paying a large tip to secure a better table in a restaurant is the same as offering a bribe in business to secure a contract." Defend or oppose this statement. How is your response to this assignment consistent with the Utilitarian moral philosophy? Explain. If it is not consistent with that philosophy, explain why your philosophy has changed.

Answer 1

Sounds like an essay question. I'll offer a brief suggestion, so as not to mitigate your creativity here.

The analogy, first off, may be inaccurate. If the tip is to the waiter, it is paid after the meal and has little to do with inducing the quality of service. On the other hand, tipping the maitre'd is an expectation in many places and is considered parcel to his income and has no legal proscription against it.

Bribing in business is an entirely different matter. Where bribing is illegal (U.S. and most developed nations) there's a vast gap and the analogy is inaccurate. Where bribing is necessary is where this gets interesting.

Obviously the bribe-maker will not bribe in excess of the anticipated utility stemming from gaining the contract. However, there is the issue of efficiency. Simply being willing to pay more for a contract does not guarantee the most efficient process of production, nor does it guarantee that the contract was issued in the most efficient manner either. Indeed, quite the contrary. Where the market functions to disseminate information via price, in a bribe there is no market - in fact,there are multiple disjointed markets, a closed auction system if you will, and hence there can be no argument for efficiency made here.

On the other hand, an argument can be made for efficiency of tipping a maitre'd.

Answer 2

In my adventure, love is a lot extra of a feeling which you will possibly be able to desire to adventure than i ought to describe. that's all approximately looking stability. intercourse serves as one among those catalyst into the courting. If the courting is in line with actual lust, intercourse purely creates a vicious cycle in line with force and persons won't locate real delight. in case you're the two rather in love, intercourse amplifies and creates a bond. intercourse isn't love, regardless of the undeniable fact that that's used (and can be) to boost the bond. intercourse won't be able to be compelled, it would desire to be at the same time generally taking place. In genuine like that's going to be emotionally, spiritually and bodily. while all is asserted and carried out although, it somewhat is composed of balancing actual, religious and emotional intimacy. a three legged stool will tip over if one leg is purely too long, and so that's with relationships.

Answer 3

Paying money before you get a table is indeed bribing,
nobody is gettint sued or arrested for that b/c it's accepted, and b/c the crime is just way too small.

Answer 4

I think your right, I also think Money gets what money wants...And those of us who do not have it know this, The ones with it live in a different world then us...

I would like to have a lot of money....one day, PLease