Why people ignore Osama Bin Ladin?Is people affried of him?
2007-03-12 08:40:32 · 13 answers · asked by nish 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Well there should be difference between a president of United State of America and a terrorist..........Bush is a president and holding the most important position in the world........and being a super power he also bears some responsbilities toward the world! Well if such a responsible person come to the level of a terrorist, he would be talked much.....Osama is not holding any state , any seat and he is not bound to any oath....he is a free man and whatever he is doing is his own act.While this is different for Bush, Bush is representing the whole American nation, World would be looking at him when there would be some problem to world peace........Well if such a person get involved in wars and destroy world peace himself , definitely he would be blamed more......one can not compare a President with a street terrorist.......but unfortunatly Bush has shown himself to be equal to a terrorist and this time is responsible for the millions of deaths ! peoples do not ignore Osama he is equaly hated..but bush is representing a country and this kind of wars does not suit a country which call itself a super democracy! and Btw peoples are not afraid of Osama but they are definitely afraid of bush ! who is in power actualy ! While osama is not in power....he is a media hype!
2007-03-12 10:54:30 · answer #1 · answered by ★Roshni★ 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
why all people blame on bush for war?why People can't ask is Osama terrorist of humanity?
Well Bush raged a war in Iraq for no reason and created a country which is safe heaven and breeding ground for terrorists.
Bin Laden attacked American Interests - killed a few thousands of them and made sure every country on planet starts hunting terrorists/extremists.
In other words Bush created Terror infra and Osama destroyed it...
Why people ignore Osama Bin Ladin?Is people affried of him?
No one is afraid of Osama - but he is no longer relevant hence ignored. Osama doesnt dictates anything - He is just a symbol - a hero in eyes of those who admire him. The only way to kill Osama now is to erase him from public memory - ignoring is the ammo you whoud use to make sure osama is erased
2007-03-12 17:53:56 · answer #2 · answered by nishant s 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are correct. It goes like this, in an accident between lorry and car, the lorry is taken into task, irrespective of fault it makes. It goes with the cost of the vehicle. Similarly, here too. fanatism plays a role. Fanatics can make anything to that effect. If Osama is considered as a terrorist, they why his own men or country did not capture him, ex. pak. As such, it is people, rather Osama's people; blame on Bush. It is very simple as that
2007-03-15 00:53:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i am sure osama is at fault for many things that have harmed people but this war is not one of them,it started with him when America was so upset after 9-11 but quickly changed to Saddam as soon as bush got the ball rolling i do not believe in our troops being in Iraq.the news shows every night film of the troops being under attack for doing what bush has told them to do but when Chaney went to Iraq the moment a bomb exploded close to him they loaded him back on a plane and got him out of there to safety.. this is a mess that the next president will have to sort out and bush knows it why should he give troop removal a thought just keep getting our men in uniform killed and when his days in the white house is done and over someone else will have to clean up the mess he has made i can say with hesitation i support the troops they have no other choice they have to follow orders and i know this but i do not support the war its going no where
2007-03-13 07:49:31 · answer #4 · answered by patbgone 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush started ignoring him when he invaded Iraq. Bin Laden is in Afghanistan. If Bush had wanted him, he should have left all the troops there and captured him. Don't blame the people; that was the decision of George Bush.
2007-03-16 07:43:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no no you can't mention that Muslim terrorists to be part of the problem.
Iraq links to terrorist blown over by liberals.
saddam was taken the money from the food for oil and using it to fund sucide bombers.
The master mind terrorist behind the group that killed Klingoffer was found in Iraq.
The explosive expert from the first WTC attack fled to Iraq.
So can the idea that Iraq was pure as the white driven snow about terrorrism.
Their only concern is to bash Bush.
Not the ones who started this.
The one who are funding the sucide bombers, training the explosive experts, etc.
It all have to be Bush's fault.
They are even now wanting to meet with groups that are sympathic to terrorist groups in the captial building.
http://insider.washingtontimes.com/articles/normal.php?StoryID=20070311-113356-1660r
Liberals have gone too far this time.
2007-03-12 08:49:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don't know if i understand your question totally - but the reason people blame bush for the "war" is the war in iraq. bin ladin isn't in iraq, and never was, yet there we are. so we blame him for a war that has nothing to do with terrorism.
2007-03-12 08:48:54 · answer #7 · answered by jack spicer 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hai friend how ru.I blame bush diffidently.Bush asking i going to control the terrorism,but wat result he got......! . Osama kill around 5000 (Sept 11 on tween tower) . But bush kill above 50,00,000 ( Iraq and Afghan )people not Iraqis and Afghan people only American drop also . who is the respance of this dead .Now tell who is the terroist ?
2007-03-12 09:46:56 · answer #8 · answered by mohamed r 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because the war is not only against osama but against the whole country
2007-03-15 22:36:35 · answer #9 · answered by kalai 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is blamed for CONTINUING the war. Osama is blamed for CONTINUING Terrorism.
2007-03-12 08:47:54 · answer #10 · answered by Marvinator 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋