2007-03-12 07:38:56 · 7 answers · asked by Jo 4 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
Now, it's personal opinion only, but I consider her very mean. She claims to be working for the Republican Party and claims that everything she says is fact.
With her though, I see no integrity in what she is trying to do. All I see is that she is coming across like a radio "shock-jock" just saying things to get attention for herself. She says things she knows are completely made up, and makes bigoted remarks and publicly refuses to apologize.
So yeah, Mean.
2007-03-12 10:08:35 · answer #1 · answered by pharoahmoan 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
She has a tendency to be a bit heavy handed in her use of irony and sarcasm. Sometimes she gets off a perfect thunderbolt of humor as she exposes the absurdity of her target's illogic or silliness, but even I, who greatly enjoy her books, find her a little over the edge at times.
I still think she can write circles around such dimwits as Michael Moore and Al Franken. I have never even been able to finish one chapter of the garbage they write.
2007-03-12 16:19:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
She's like a mean child. Name calling? Come on Ann, grow up!!
2007-03-12 22:51:02 · answer #3 · answered by Ljoy 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
STraight forward who has time to explain everything to people who are under educated. Just state the facts and if it hurts you great if it is an assist great also.
I am not your dad I do not have to be sensative to you.
2007-03-12 14:42:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
She's straight forward about being mean.
Her books are a waste of ink.
2007-03-12 19:17:40 · answer #5 · answered by Gerry S 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Brutally honest!!!
2007-03-13 03:09:47 · answer #6 · answered by revjohnfmcfuddpucker 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Mean, rude, crude, nasty, etc.
2007-03-12 14:43:11 · answer #7 · answered by napqueen 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋