English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Was it because he recorded in so many languages? He wasn't even a great singer. I think Luis Miguel is a much better singer than him.

2007-03-12 07:31:28 · 10 answers · asked by AL IS ON VACATION AND HAS NO PIC 5 in Entertainment & Music Music

10 answers

I never even heard of him So he must be nothing special.

2007-03-12 07:34:10 · answer #1 · answered by Odessa Fraser 3 · 0 1

I asked myselft the same question before and honestly I don't know the answer yet.
Luis Miguel is good too but THE best Latin singer EVER is definitely MARC ANTHONY!!

2007-03-12 07:52:28 · answer #2 · answered by N.S 4 · 0 0

The guy was a wonderful singer, and he had incredible character. Much better than his son, too.

2007-03-12 08:26:13 · answer #3 · answered by EitS Fan 3 · 0 0

Because he was a great singer and very handsome, all the women just loved him including my mom! I think it was his style and being Latin didn't hurt! lol

2007-03-12 08:20:39 · answer #4 · answered by QueenFan0946 5 · 0 0

Obviously a lot of people liked him.Some may still.
He is not on my list either.Everyone is entitled to their own opinion .

2007-03-12 07:41:06 · answer #5 · answered by sharen d 6 · 0 0

he was the original ladies man...seriously so that's probably why so many women loved him.

but hey i wonder the same thing about people sean combs...

2007-03-12 07:39:32 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He probably had the looks

2007-03-12 07:53:18 · answer #7 · answered by sugarscamp 5 · 0 0

SAME REASON WHY MICHAEL JACKSON, MADONNA, AND GWEN STEFANI ARE POPULAR =PEOPLE LOVE THEM.

2007-03-12 07:39:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Homosexual support.

2007-03-12 07:34:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No idea.

2007-03-12 07:34:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers