English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Stalin, Mao,Pol Pot, Hitler (national socialist party aka Nazi)

2007-03-12 07:29:47 · 18 answers · asked by Bob N 4 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

By in history in mean recent history

2007-03-12 07:33:50 · update #1

Karen p your self righteous smugness i can stomach but to call me i "bushie" is downright slander

2007-03-12 08:40:17 · update #2

mojo, do try to get out more, looking up your own backside all day must be tedious.

2007-03-12 08:42:48 · update #3

Mojo, do you intend to make a citizens arrest?

2007-03-12 12:14:24 · update #4

18 answers

Yes it fits perfectly with the socialists anti-human agenda. Socialists have long worshiped at the alter of Darwin which preaches that some people are superior to others. This allows them to justify mass murder on the scale we have seen in the last 100 years. It is easy to convince yourself that you are doing no wrong when your victims are less human than you and there is no difference between a chicken a dog a worm or a boy

2007-03-12 07:37:28 · answer #1 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 2 6

All forms of human Utopian theory inevitably bring about atrocities and unspeakable atrocities. human beings are no longer God. we can't and can't rid the international of evil and that's a infantile make have confidence delusion to have confidence so. youngster's make have confidence video games get human beings killed too. The socialists have purely succeeded in suckering in countless adults and slaughtering countless those with their make have confidence video games that we are able to remake the international into what we'd like it to be.

2016-11-24 22:42:24 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Have you noticed that people with limited intellect consider Hitler a "socialist". Or Stalin, for that matter. Have you noticed that Pol Pot's regime was an extreme reaction to mass killings of completely innocent (and apolitical) Cambodian peasants by our capitalist mass murderers? That our relentless butchery was what actually DROVE the civilian uneducated populace into the hands of Pol Pot, who didn't start out as a butcher but sure enough became one after our slaughter drove the majority of the country insane? For that matter, did you know that just a couple years later, we decided that Pol Pot was our buddy and aided him with CASH? Did you know that when you insert yourself into other people's lives and governments and kill them for disobeying your orders they tend to become a little brutal as a REACTION? Did you know that the intellectual and nationalist lawyer Fidel Castro rose and was supported by his people because his people were living in virtual slavery under the hands of a U.S. supported (and brutal) puppet dictator. And that he only became paranoid and repressive after our CIA tried to assassinate him oh, 10 or so times and killed hundreds of innocent Cubans and non-Cuban tourists. If you add up the capitalist killings of innocents,i.e., genocide of Indians in both continents, slavery and genocide of Africans, (both those transported to the "New World" and within Africa proper) 2 million in Vietnam, 200,000 East Timor, millions in Indonesia with rise of Suharto, millions more between Salvadoranean death squads, Nicaraguans by contras, Koreans, those hapless Cambodians, not to mention Hiroshima and Nagasaki, etc., really, need I go on(?) you will see after a modicum of research that your question is simply based on a false premises. By the way , have you ever noticed that smart people actually have the ability to understand that the real world actually is somewhat more complicated than you Bushies choose to understand?

2007-03-12 08:00:54 · answer #3 · answered by karin p 2 · 3 1

Erm... National Socialism (despite it's name) was a fascist movement and not a socialist one. The two political philosophies are about as far apart as it is possible to be.

Was Genghis Khan a socialist? Before the Mongol invasion, unified China reportedly had approximately 120 million inhabitants; after the conquest was completed in 1279, the 1300 census reported roughly 60 million people.

Or how about the Turks in Armenia (1.5m)?

Unfortunately mass murder is not the preserve of any one political philosophy.

2007-03-12 07:40:49 · answer #4 · answered by Matthew H 3 · 6 2

It is another thing to be a socialist and to say that you are one. Perhaps socialism is an idea and can not actually exist, though Ulaf Palme managed to make socialism true.

2007-03-12 22:08:56 · answer #5 · answered by be good 2 · 0 0

Hitler = National Socialist - the original name of the party he joined. As soon as he was in control they abandoned any pretence of socialism.

Stalin = communist in name, Fascist Imperialist in practice.

Pol Pol = communist.

Ignorant little bugger aren't you?

*** UPDATE **** Bob N - Thank you for your additional comment. I guess looking up my own backside would be a darn sight more entertaining that reading the drivel you post on Y/A.
I notice one of your previous questions asked whether it should be illegal to be stupid. In your case, I guess perhaps it should.

2007-03-12 08:05:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

" It is easy to convince yourself that you are doing no wrong when your victims are less human than you and there is no difference between a chicken a dog a worm or a boy "

I find this part hilarious. You assume we are better then a chicken, dog, worm.

2007-03-12 07:41:35 · answer #7 · answered by crymsyneyez 1 · 0 0

Get real Hitler, calling yourself a socialist doesn't make you a socialist. FACISTFACISTFACISTFACISTFACISTFACIST...,,,

was saddam a socialist
is Mugabe a socialist

Or were they all just scumbag dictators (in which case it doesn't matter what they called themselves)...,,,

2007-03-12 07:42:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

Hmmm... I just counted three communists and one fascist. Where is the socialist?

2007-03-12 11:14:37 · answer #9 · answered by Martin 5 · 1 1

Throw in "atheist" too. Don't forget all the genocide in Africa.

2007-03-12 07:54:35 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers