hollow moon additional data?

Question

earlier i asked if the moon was hollow on the basis of info presented in this site.http://www.geocities.com/jilaens/moon.htm
the moon has a number of lines on it that seem to have no reason for being the way they are.
as we know the surface of the moon is covered in dust and if the moon was hollow vibrations in the structure may cause the dust to move in a specific waydepending on the frequency of the vibration as you will see in this demonstation.
http://ebaumsworld.com/2007/01/salt-sound-waves.html
so could the dust be indicating internal structure in the moon by how the particles are reacting to vibrations?

its nice to see two top contributers responed to this question even if they only answered with another question and the one about about the tides is good also but he dosnt say how much mass is required to cause tides only that they would vary on the basis of the moons density.

Answer 1

Thanks for the new web site you gave. But you seem to be crazy. The title was put by them as Hollow Moon just to attract persons like you. Anyway it says that the inner part is less dense than the outer part of the Moon. This fact was proved by Apollo experiments. Normally hollow means nothing in the core except air. So moon is solid.

Answer 2

Hi. A hollow Moon would not exert the gravitational pull that a solid Moon would. Live by the ocean and watch the tides for a while. You'll get it.

Answer 3

Doesn't the fact that not one single science site has anything about the hollow moon theory make you a little suspicious?

Here's a link specifically about the creator if this theory:

http://www.bautforum.com/showthread.php?t=49613

Answer 4

Hmmmmm........ You seem to be of the 'Goring' school of physics and cosmology. Try looking in
http://www.alaska.net/~clund/e_djublonskopf/Flatearthsociety.htm
for more thoughts along those same lines.

Doug