At one time, I thought TNA was going to be the alternative that to the crap that WWE puts out since 2002. Russo's crappy writing is killing this company just like he killed WCW in the end. Last night, they had a Chicken Wing Match, Elevation X and Last Rites Match. That "Last Rites" Match was complete trash, the fans yelled "FIRE RUSSO" during the match, which is sad.
All four brands have gone to the toilet. Until they get better, they shall be known as:
RAW is CRAP
"WHACK" DOWN
TOTAL NONSENSE in ACTION
And the worst of them all:
EXTREMELY CRAPPY WRESTLING
2007-03-12 07:21:43 · 13 answers · asked by Arnold 4 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
TNA= Better matches than WWE but are starting to move into the "entertainment" business more than wrestling which is getting a bit annoyin
Smackdown= Aimed towards small kids
Raw= Aimed towards older ages but their shows are so bad and they are using superstars incorrectly
ECW: I thought it would have been nice to see the old guys back but the New breed fewd is so bad
Overall WWE= -3
2007-03-12 08:59:57 · answer #1 · answered by Tna "We are Wrestling" 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
While you make an excellent point, the wrestling in TNA is beautiful compared to the other crap calling itself "sports entertainment". But what you have to realize is TNA tries to stay innovative and likes to keep its fans excited by not seeing the same old match types. Plus there is still hope for the newest wrestling company, WRESTLING SOCIETY X, support it!
2007-03-12 07:37:00 · answer #2 · answered by jscorpiox 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They shold bin the WWE brands and just get back to one big show - im sick of rivalries that seem to last for ages. Lets be honest, there aint that many big stars anymore to have three shows. Maybe Cena, Batista, Undertaker, HBK, Triple H and erm, Flair? And then the rest are run of the mill. The King Booker was old the second they did it. Bring back Nash!
2007-03-12 08:53:42 · answer #3 · answered by Dizzy Bizzle 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i do agree on most of it. ecw is awful. tna is the worst. raw and sd are pretty good. they are nothing like they used to be though. tna is sad. everything they do...they are feeding off the wwe. like for example. vkm....wtf? vodoo kin mafia my as s. i think the wwe needs to get back to the way things were run in the late 90s. it was so much better then. last rites match??? maybe last ride match. see they cant come up with stuff on their own.
2007-03-12 07:27:44 · answer #4 · answered by kccwljtta 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Smackdown got nice wrestling. RAW is all about drama , ECW is just bad. TNA was going the right direction BUT.....Vince Russo (a copy cat) ruined it.
2007-03-12 07:36:15 · answer #5 · answered by Ming P 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i agree with everything you said except for raw, it is the only good brand left and about TNA, look people dont want to see two decent sized wrestlers battle on a surface 20 inches across. They want full in and out ring action that shows amazing technique, endurance and power, not a balancing act.
2007-03-12 08:42:02 · answer #6 · answered by thegamerdug 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
fire the idiot, down went wcw and now look at tna, no wonder wwe is kak with pillocks like him in charge it doesnt need to have a good show
2007-03-12 08:11:00 · answer #7 · answered by mcgowan7 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
tna is the best wrestlin i mean it is wack wit the storylines and all but the wrestlers are better then the wwe,and ecw
2007-03-12 09:32:30 · answer #8 · answered by Day 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your extally right man the vinces have ruined wrestling
2007-03-12 07:24:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's why I prefer mixed martial arts like the UFC!
Brutal and real.
2007-03-12 07:30:06 · answer #10 · answered by dopeadevil23 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋