Tna better than WWE?

Question

Yes it is...state your opinion here and i shall prove you right or wrong

And lmao no its not the same you retards! they are completely different

Answer 1

I was a much bigger fan of wrestling in the 80s and early 90s and then once again in the late late 90s when I became a huge Kurt Angle fan so that helps. But overall I just don't buy into what WWE has been doing recently, granted I don't watch religiously anymore but TNA just seems to be more what wrestling used to be while WWE seems more like a Stock Market Day Trader. They try to figure out what fans are thinking short term and try to just appease everyone and try to get the biggest buck short term instead of looking out for the long term product

Answer 2

TNA has 2 sides to it.

1. Matches that involve people who more or less made a name for themselves in TNA.

2. Matches involving former WWE people.

Why can't TNA do something better than pair up Christian Cage and Tyson Tomko? We already saw them together in WWE.

Maybe it's because they have no idea on how to do something different, so they have to take something sucessful that was already done in WWE.

Answer 3

This is the easiest answer I've seen on Answers. Of course it is, and for many reasons, but I will only share with you one reason. SUSPENSE actually exists in TNA. You cannot honestly say that you know how the matches will end or who will win. RAW has become predictable, John Cena and HBK will end up dealing with each other at 11:03 p.m. every monday after Rated Rko runs from the ring. That is the only storyline that anyone is actually paying attention to. In TNA you can pick your poison, Angle vs Steiner, Joe vs Cage, Sting vs Abyss, LAX vs 3D, and a sleeper Starr vs Senshi, I fall asleep watching RAW and Smackdown, I watch TNA closely, and I am a true die hard fan of storytelling through mat work, not interview time.

Answer 4

WWE>TNA.


WWE has: a longer show, better wrestlers, more developed wrestlers, brighter talents, better storylines, better PPV's.

Many TNA wrestlers are WWE-rejects (Kurt Angle, Christian). X-Division kicks *** for sure, but nothing, and I mean NOTHING, in wrestling beats: Wrestlemania, Undertaker, Triple H, Shawn Michaels.... these guys are some of the best ever in the history of pro-wrestling. I could go on, but I have got tea!!

Answer 5

TNA is not as good as WWE. Yes Tna has some great matchesx, but It is BORING!!!! In TNA the storylines a weak and you can see the moves that make wrestling fake. In the WWE, everything is smooth and it has strong storylines. TNA will never make all the success that the WWE has made.

Answer 6

they both have there good points, me im wwe through and through but i do like tna, tna i suppose is better for action, but wwe have the better wrestlers overall and for me i think wwe is much better for entertainment which at the end of the day i like a bit of both and wwe gives me that so yeah i think wwe is better ,however they could still do with improving themselves wwe at the mo is far from perfect

Answer 7

Hell no! In wwe Kurt angle vs Christian cage was a regular smackdown opening match. In tna it a freaking ppv main event for the world title.Dont tna trust any of their original superstars as main eventers?Obviously they dont. Didnt you hear what billy gun said?He said x divion sucks, and that if wwe offered him a job he would take it.You can tell he really supports his team.COMMON PROVE ME WRONG.THATS RIGHT YOU CANT.

Answer 8

TNA is a whole lot better than WWE

1. Actually wrestle

2. Storylines dont suck

3. Good Wrestlers

Answer 9

I think both of them are the same now cause kurt angle moved to tna and that was a big shock cause he said for family reasons he quit wwe!!!
and who cares about wrestling it is fixed and so fake apart from tlc matches etc.

Conclusion:
i think it is the same

Answer 10

TNA has better in ring action but WWE has better gimmicks and storylines.If kurt angle never moved to TNA in the first place then TNA would suck.