English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

Well lets just test that "hands on" theory...shall we?

2007-03-12 06:22:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes

2007-03-12 13:32:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, defiantly! I've worked for people who have the book sense but no hands on and they didn't know anything.

2007-03-12 13:26:23 · answer #3 · answered by kattsmeow 7 · 0 0

I would have to say that's the best way to go, I would find it a bit hypocritical to be taught by someone who read the theory yet didn't apply it, what could that person possibly teach me that I couldn't read myself?

2007-03-12 13:28:00 · answer #4 · answered by ☆Karma☆ 6 · 0 0

a background in the history etc. then yes, mostly hands on experience...

2007-03-12 13:24:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

In my industry, yes. You can have a masters in chemistry, sure it helps, but to see problems daily are the best teacher.

2007-03-12 13:27:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes, you'd learn better that way from your own mistakes and you're going to reconize you are about to make a mistake ,later on , catch yourself, and never make that same mistake ever again. Hopefully.

2007-03-12 13:27:05 · answer #7 · answered by Lauran B. 4 · 1 0

it helps to have hands on experience...that way you know how to handle problems from having solved them

2007-03-12 13:33:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes. It always does

2007-03-12 13:24:04 · answer #9 · answered by Ron B. 7 · 1 0

yes

2007-03-12 13:26:45 · answer #10 · answered by Jase 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers