Well lets just test that "hands on" theory...shall we?
2007-03-12 06:22:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes
2007-03-12 13:32:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, defiantly! I've worked for people who have the book sense but no hands on and they didn't know anything.
2007-03-12 13:26:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by kattsmeow 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would have to say that's the best way to go, I would find it a bit hypocritical to be taught by someone who read the theory yet didn't apply it, what could that person possibly teach me that I couldn't read myself?
2007-03-12 13:28:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by ☆Karma☆ 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
a background in the history etc. then yes, mostly hands on experience...
2007-03-12 13:24:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
In my industry, yes. You can have a masters in chemistry, sure it helps, but to see problems daily are the best teacher.
2007-03-12 13:27:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, you'd learn better that way from your own mistakes and you're going to reconize you are about to make a mistake ,later on , catch yourself, and never make that same mistake ever again. Hopefully.
2007-03-12 13:27:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Lauran B. 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
it helps to have hands on experience...that way you know how to handle problems from having solved them
2007-03-12 13:33:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. It always does
2007-03-12 13:24:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ron B. 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
yes
2007-03-12 13:26:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jase 4
·
0⤊
0⤋