tht mavs came in to town. thats what happened
2007-03-12 05:10:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by D-TOWN 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Amen brother they got it handed to them and now they are saying whaa we got injuries whaaaaaaa i am a baby whaaaaa what they should be saying is the mavs played a good game and we did not have an answer and it dosen't matter if the mavs got beat by the lakers a bunch of times in history we only care about what happened last night!!!!
2007-03-12 07:34:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by #1 Nowitzki, and Duncan fan 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The fact of the matter is...no matter what the Lakers record was against the Mavs in the past, they still need to pick their jocks off the floor after the Mavs tore them apart last night. What happened was Buckner and George shut down Kobe and the Mavs are the better team by far. Kobe who????? GO MAVS!
2007-03-12 05:16:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mike R 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
I'm tired of Lakers fans making excuses Whaa Whaa we're missing Luke Walton and Lamar Odom and Vladamir Radmanovic, whaa whaaa
You got your @sses handed to you on a Silver platter last night by the best team in the NBA. Are Walton, Odom, and Radmanovic really worth 36 points? By the way Dirk only played 29 minutes last night, You guys suck and Avery treated you like a spare expansion team we rested our starters in the 4th quarter, had we wanted to beat you by 50 we could have.
2007-03-12 06:42:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by joshua f 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'm satisfied the Celtics finally close their critics up. All yet between the ESPN "experts" picked the Lakers to win. I doubt everybody of them fairly watched more desirable than 15 of the Celtics video games contained in the accepted season. The east obviously had both maximum suitable protective communities contained in the league. historic previous teaches us that tremendous protection continually wins and this year's Celtics is between the most suitable protective crew contained in the historic previous of the NBA. at the same time as the finals got here, swiftly those "experts" replaced their options and determined that tremendous offense might want to succeed over tremendous protection. they are all Laker bandwagon hoppers and that i wish the are embarrassed with their possibilities. regardless of injuries to three of their starters, the Lakers are so delicate, they could't even carry courtroom.
2016-10-17 11:47:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No Lamar, no Luke, no Vlad, the lakers season has been a season of injury's, if we had a full roster line up we for sure be a 50 plus team
2007-03-12 08:23:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by A S 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Useless question...they are obviously hurting because of injuries! They have yet to play one game with all five starters healthy and have played most games this season with atleast two starters missing...the fact that they are still the 6th seed team in the WEST (not the east), but WEST...is a testament to how deep this team is and how strong their bench will be once all the starters are back healthy.
2007-03-12 06:01:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by ithinksports 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hah hah
We beat down the Lakers
2007-03-12 05:13:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
The Lakers are suffering from what the rivers and streams and ponds are going through, a drought. Only their drought is age factored and I'm sooo happy!
2007-03-12 05:18:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
LMAO! The Lakers suck because of Kobe!
2007-03-12 10:01:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by jdwj76 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
If your following events in the NBA you would notice that three of our key players(lamar Odom,Luke Walton,radmanovic)are injured,also Chris mihm.
2007-03-12 05:39:06
·
answer #11
·
answered by flyguy 2
·
1⤊
1⤋