is to save their shareholders money so they dont have to pay it to the american government.....How about all the money halliburton has made because our government has went to war... With billions of dollars in taxpayers money......You all make real sense......
2007-03-12 04:57:59 · 3 answers · asked by PUBLIC CORRUPTION 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Clearly, Halliburton is moving to Dubai (the UAE) in order to get closer to its most important allies - the UAE royal family and its opaque, corrupt banking system which is the financial epicenter of global Islamic terrorism (not to mention the drug industry).
Just for fun, check out this report, the 9/11 commission report on the financing of 9/11.
http://www.9-11commission.gov/staff_statements/911_TerrFin_Monograph.pdf
Here's what they have to say about the UAE:
"The vast majority of the money funding the September 11 attacks flowed through the UAE. The fact that
Ali Abdul Aziz Ali was able to use an alias or partial name, and show no identification, for five of the six
wire transfers from the UAE should come as a surprise to no one."
(banks in UAE are state-owned, which means controlled by the royal family)
And let's see which countries they're talking about in this comprehensive analysis of how the 9/11 hijackers were able to pull off the terror attack of the century:
# of search hits for Saudi: 427
# of search hits for UAE: 86
# of search hits for Pakistan: 25
# of search hits for Iraq: 3
# of search hits for Syria: 2
# of search hits for Iran: 1
Who are Bush's "allies" in the war on terror? Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Pakistan.
Who has he declared as his "enemies"? Iraq, Syria, and Iran.
This doesn't add up, folks.
The UAE royal family also happened to maintain a hunting camp in Afghanistan before 9/11, where they regularly socialized with Bin Laden.
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/context.jsp?item=a0299gulfroyalty
Why is Bin Laden linked to Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Pakistan? Because - duh - those countries were the CIA's partners in building and supporting the radical Islamic mujahedeen in Afghanistan during the 1980's. We left, but they never did. And apparently the Republicans who built those partnerships (e.g. Bush Sr. and era defense chiefs Rumsfeld and Cheney) never gave them up either... Traitors!
2007-03-12 06:09:46 · answer #1 · answered by Mark P 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your question seems to be confusing. I will agree that Haliburton is scab-assed robbers.
Cheney should be making enormous amounts of money with this war and the granting of "no bid" contracts to Haliburton, his former and future company.
2007-03-12 12:06:01 · answer #2 · answered by supressdesires 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
here is a better idea. How about taming down all the rediculous tax hikes aimed at keeping our corporations out of our own country, so the money remains in the country?
2007-03-12 12:02:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋