because halliburton has just moved their headquarters there?
Im mot sure I can thank all you republicans enough for voting in these awesome leaders.....What next?
2007-03-12 04:38:52 · 8 answers · asked by PUBLIC CORRUPTION 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Your right....I am upset these people have corrupted our society so much that the average american has to suffer while they make money and cover up the crimes they commit....... They should make it so the average american is able to afford stock in halliburton and all the other companies that make a infinite amount of cash. But they have no concern for the average american and think they are better than everyone....
2007-03-12 04:52:11 · update #1
You are misinformed.
The CONTRACTS running the ports, were ALREADY owned by a foreign entity. The company who owned the CONTRACTS wanted to sell them to ANOTHER foreign entity. This most likely would not have changed anything at our ports. The same employees, etc. would have remained.
But, yet again, the liberals love to scream their half truths in attempt to distort reality
2007-03-12 04:46:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
McCain consents with Bush on each thing. Why could desire to the Dubai port deal be distinctive. even while McCain says he would not consider Bush he lands up helping Bush on the concern.
2016-10-02 00:01:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why did George Soros recently spent $62.2 million for 2 million shares of Halliburton. Why would he give so much money to organizations like Move On, who constantly hammer Halliburton only to buy a large amount of stock? Or did he orchestrate it to lower the price?
2007-03-12 04:44:17 · answer #3 · answered by lumpy r 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No US ports are being sold.
US ports are (and have been) managed by private companies, some of which are based overseas. The particular company that is bidding on these ports happen to be based in Dubai.
But they'll be following all the same (laughably poor) security standards and legal requirements when managing the port, just as if the company were based in Spain or Senegal or Australia.
2007-03-12 04:50:48 · answer #4 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. First the move you reference has not yet taken place. Second, numerous foreign companies do business in the US. Third there is no way to stop companies from moving out of the US and moving jobs with them unless we want to scrap our current form of government and our capitalist system in favor of policies that will make us all more poor.
2007-03-12 04:45:37 · answer #5 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow, are you ticked because you "didn't get a piece of the pie?"
As a corrupt Democrat I bet missed opportunities like that really tick you off.
2007-03-12 04:42:25 · answer #6 · answered by 9D4KHP 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Anytime the question is why or why not, the answer is money. ESPECIALLY where GW Bush is concerned.
2007-03-12 04:45:10 · answer #7 · answered by mxzptlk 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No wonder the Bush family wants to buy 96,000 acres in Paraguay.....LOOT THE TREASURY AND RUN!
2007-03-12 08:42:29 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋