English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

We are about to bankrupt Iran as Reagan did the USSR. It costs them 10 times the amount to produce the same barrel of oil that the rest of the OPEC nations do. Nuclear Iran will dominate the Middle East and therefore OPEC.
An Iraqi terrorist organization governing in Iraq will allow them to prop up terror cells throughout the world thus signaling the eventuality of true a nuclear holocaust.

2007-03-12 04:15:26 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

craboy then why are you willing to allow them the certain power if we continue your liberal agenda??? maybe you should do some learning too?

2007-03-12 04:32:16 · update #1

Philbert I suppose you will enjoy the nuclear fallout

2007-03-12 04:33:14 · update #2

To the anonymous copy and paster. You obviously haven't seen his speech where he says he believes it is his purpose to facilitate the return of Allah with the complete destruction of Irael and the death of America.

2007-03-12 04:36:36 · update #3

Geoffrey==broad was to get the attention though please tell me what "black shirts" are. I am against the far right as much as the far left.

2007-03-12 04:38:23 · update #4

Tellme== YES the far right are similar to Nazi's I agree

2007-03-12 04:39:20 · update #5

Kappolack-- Lump? maybe you shouldn't lump me into a category by reading only one question and none of my answers....Take some of your own advice oops I forgot your a far lefty and never do that sort of thing.

2007-03-12 04:41:16 · update #6

Jacob-- I concede you are correct. but the result of their efforts to gain power may eliminate any chance of their agenda. They may win a battle that will eventually lead to their demise.

2007-03-12 04:42:58 · update #7

Theswedish I'm aware of their Conservative view though the Liberal view and actions in this country are going to empower the Iranians to where we will have to invade instead of allowing them to fall from within.

2007-03-12 04:45:18 · update #8

STEVE_ it has to do with the fact that unless we remain in Iraq and promote Liberty and freedom the Iranian extremist will fall from within rather then the 10's of thousands lives we will lose if we invade which is an inevitibility if we don't.

2007-03-12 04:47:45 · update #9

MLAHEGI==Yes it was designed to draw attention and debate and it succeeded.

2007-03-12 04:48:47 · update #10

13 answers

IRAN is a Theocracy and would, by definition, be FAR RIGHT

2007-03-12 04:20:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

The world is too complex for idiots like you. Your puny brain can't differentiate between Iranians, the far left and liberals so you have to lump them all together. You'd be better off if you just stayed home and watched sit-coms. Leave the real world to people who can think.

2007-03-12 11:21:39 · answer #2 · answered by kappalokka 3 · 3 0

Easy on the paranoia, big fella. You're point is legitimate about oil production in Iran. However, as far as your extememly broad question is concerned, conversely, why don't we call all conservatives "Black Shirts"?

2007-03-12 11:21:26 · answer #3 · answered by Geoffrey F 2 · 4 0

Yet Ahmedinijad is purging the liberal professors from his universities. You need to learn the definition of liberal.

Oh, and the $3.00 gas will help Iran pay for their war machine.

2007-03-12 11:19:42 · answer #4 · answered by Crabboy4 4 · 2 0

No, the far left are not Iranians. They are socialists. They do not want to take over and dominate the world. They only want to destroy the United States and capitalism. Only if they succeed in making everyone equally miserable with no chance of improvement, will they be satisfied.

2007-03-12 11:23:32 · answer #5 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 1 2

Well, the US already has terror cells throughout the world, attacking and trespassing and destroying with glee, I guess then it would all be equal.

2007-03-12 11:20:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Iranians are rather conservative in their political ideology. Good one anyway, don't let facts get in your way!

2007-03-12 11:23:34 · answer #7 · answered by theswedishfish710 4 · 2 0

Well the liberals have been supporting them for a while now.

2007-03-12 11:23:58 · answer #8 · answered by lumpy r 3 · 1 2

Generalization, labeling, and paranoia all in one question.

2007-03-12 11:27:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I believe treasonous, moronic buffoons would be a better option.

2007-03-12 11:20:13 · answer #10 · answered by bigbro3006 3 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers