Both will hand over the control of Irqa to terrorists, Iran & Syria. So does it really matter what we call it ?
2007-03-12 03:59:35 · 13 answers · asked by Mail J 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
susi: I heard a lot from democrats they want to redeploy, but not where to.. may be you can tell me. Obviously, redeploying the soldiers to somewhere they are not needed don't make sense. if the dems wants to bring them home, why do they have to call it "Re-Deployment" ?
2007-03-12 06:05:10 · update #1
There is no difference.
Just another bush flip flop.
2007-03-12 04:02:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
those men can not even spell rockit sientist and that they nonetheless go there to get their posters revealed ... or no ... that become the sign-n-tist or something like that. this is all only too complicated. i presumed Sister Mary Frances had retired yet no ... SHE continues to be right here ... on Yahoo/solutions posing as Tippy ... arrghhhh ... screeeeeamm ... oh the soreness. yet particular I completely agree alongside with your conundrum right here. Having been by using a Jesuit guidance i will concur with you omnificence over the unitelligible duplicity and mass stupidity that seems to be the made of a public skewl guidance. Now i be attentive to what they advise via "No newborn Left in the back of". in case you flunk you visit Iraq. Hmmmm .... that ought to get the grades up, u thnk? yet Tippy, you are able to no longer call all of them idiots to their faces or they provides you with citations so whadyadoo? And inspite of each little thing if every person makes use of TSI as their mentor what are you able to assume? BTW ... TSI stands for THE perfect fool and that must be none different than? you are able to guess something spectacular? Oh of path ... all of us found out that throughout Grammar college. The nuns have been advise however. in case you mentioned this is over their they might beat you bloody with a ruler so which you found out to no longer make THAT mistake. So we only saved it to ourselves on the playground and only prayed that there have been no spies for Sister Helen Patricia out their. :-) Pax Vobiscum ... et *** Spiritu tuo
2016-11-24 22:19:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Re-deployment means sending a soldier back to a situation. Cut & run means leaving the Iraqii people stuck with what we started and don't finish. where are these similar?
2007-03-12 04:16:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is exactly the same, either one we do will end in this countrys demise and the lives of millions. Liberals cant see past protecting the terrorists rights to see the issues with "re-deploying."
2007-03-17 14:53:28 · answer #4 · answered by jlk15 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Cut and run" was a phrase that the Republicans used about the Democrats plan to move aside and let the factions fight it out and let the coalition move beyond the boarders and close them off so that nothing could cross and rearm.
2007-03-19 04:51:48 · answer #5 · answered by dVille 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A UN-Patriotic American, who listens to Reid, Schumer, and Pelosi go on about whats wrong with Bush, and not one reasonable suggestion as to what to do. A coward doesn't cut and run, he only runs his/her mouth !!! May God continue to Bless America !!
2007-03-17 10:32:34 · answer #6 · answered by fuzzypetshop 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Kurdish north will be our strongest ally in the Middle East. The Sunni and Shiite regions didn't like us before, and they won't like us after.
2007-03-12 04:03:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nope, in the end, it is all the same plan. Defeat
2007-03-12 04:10:52 · answer #8 · answered by az 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
"re-deployment" is whimpy Republican talk
"Cut & Run" is standard Democrat practice.
2007-03-12 04:03:11 · answer #9 · answered by J-Rod on the Radio 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No not really but i agree with u
2007-03-18 06:13:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋