Science finds cure for cancer . Conservatives reject cure theory in favor of prayer .?

Question

Science has provided absolute prove that we are contributing to global warming and still people reject it .

I am astonished that anyone can deny the absolute proof .

We have massive amounts of carbon in the air at levels that have never existed as far back as science can accurately measure .

Along with this is the correlated data that temperature and carbon track in the same pattern .
Whats not to understand about this .

Can we really be this dumb .

I am beginning to think so .

Answer 1

I have cancer and a liberal told me to put on a condom, so they can have hot sex with my corpse and not get any diseases.

Answer 2

Trouble maker, what absolute proof? You need to do a little more reading up and not blindly accept what you hear, especially by people who are trying to cause fear and panic over the global warming issue.

First, there is not more CO2 in the air than has ever existed. In fact just the opposite is true. See the earthguide link below, and you'll see over the last 450 million years, the level of CO2 was MUCH higher than the levels that we have today.

Also take a look at the paper on the current major interglacial. You'll see that the earth had higher temperatures and indeed faster temperature rises during the 13th and 14th centuries as well as the 7th century BC, just to point out a few instances. Where is the correlation between CO2 levels and these past temperature rises? They don't exist. Humans were contributing any great amounts of CO2 to the atmosphere at these times yet we saw faster temperature rises and warmer temperatures than we are seeing now. There can be no proven correlation between CO2 and temperature.

Answer 3

No it hasn't.

The warming trend began in the late 1800s. The only tangible evidence supporting the "CO2 blanket" theory is the cooling of the stratosphere - which began in the early 1990s.

So even if whatever else was involved STOPPED in the early 1990s, that's evidence that we've caused at most 0.4 degrees F of the 1.2 degrees F, or 33%.

Could we have caused the rest of it or part of the rest of it? Sure.

Is there tangible evidence of that?

No.

The correlation between CO2 levels and temperature depends on what time frame you're talking about. Hundreds of thousands of years? Yes. Hundreds of years? No. It's been warmer when CO2 levels were lower. The UN has tried to latch on to Mann's proxy models, which use cherry picked data and which when applied to the 20th century completely miss the late 20th century warming and which don't agree with others' models using a larger data set and showing the prior warm periods, to support re-writing the most recent two or three warm periods out of the climate history despite the multifarious physical evidence from around the world and contemporaneous observations that those changes were happening because it was warmer - - while at no time ever addressing how those events actually occurred. When fig and olive trees grew in Germany, contemporaneous observers wrote that it was because it was warmer, and now we're told that it wasn't warmer and that the fig and olive trees should be dismissed because they are "anecdotal."

That doesn't add to their credibility, it detracts from it.

Answer 4

Basically we can't really be sure as there are long term climatic changes and always have been. Scholars are slowly finding this out. I say don't take a chance. We have the ways to change the planet for the better. Only Corporate fools say "There's no problem." Maybe there isn't but we have the resources to ensure there will be no problems in the future. Just do it. Who wants to hear the Corporates in 20 years time saying "It's just too expensive to fix." Make sure now. And **** Corporates who will never do the human thing. Yeah, yeah, I know. Sometimes an employee will feel guilty but never untill he's made a fortune. That's too late to make a contribution.

Answer 5

Global warming is not 'proven' to exist, much less proven to be caused by humans. While the fact that we have done much to destroy the natural CO2 to Oxygen converters (trees and plant life) this trend has reversed somewhat.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=18526
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/05/01/wglob01.xml
http://www.climateaudit.org/index.php?p=205
http://www.globalwarming.org/news.php

Though I do agree that there is plenty of research conclusions on a cure to and prevention of cancer. Though liberals and conservatives alike reject the facts (not theory) in favor of Artificial drugs to further the wealth gained by pharmaceutical companies since there's no money to be made in the cure or prevention of cancer.

http://www.newmedicine.ca/
http://www.drugawareness.org/Archives/Studies/record0010.html
http://www.radicalforgiveness.com/content/rf-help-for-cancer.asp
http://www.cancer-treatment.net/CancerAndGenes.htm
http://www.drbrodie.com/personality.shtml
http://www.henrydreher.com/pages/Bk%20Detail/typec_det.html

BTW I'm neither conservative nor liberal.

Answer 6

I don't get your question and it's relevance to the rest of the stuff you are talking about. Christian Scientists pray for healing as opposed to using medicine, not conservatives.

And by the way..............there is not "absolute proof" as you so indicate. There is, according to those world renowned scientists, a 90% probability exists that humans are affecting global warming. It pretty much means the same thing, but your choice of words was incorrect. It's the difference in science between a theory and a law.

Answer 7

I couldn't agree more.

What I find astounding is that many Americans (mostly conservative) reject the notion of man's contribution to GW merely as a political ruse created by a Democrat. How small minded is that...to think that a GLOBAL issue of this magnitude, which affects the entire planet, is simply a game in American politics?

I would suggest that it would be the right and honourable thing to do for self respecting Republican leaders to jump on board and demonstrate to their party followers that this IS a global issue....and not a political one.

Answer 8

Is there a question here?

Conservatives reject the politicized nature of global warming. And we reject the so-called solution.

Answer 9

Excess co2 is caused by humans, few doubt that. This co2 is harmful to the atmosphere, and could change weather, and creat havoc on society in ways never seen before. The scientist have done a great job monitoring the co2 situation....and it rises every year.

Sooner or later, all our pollution in the atmosphere will catch up with us.

Answer 10

Absolute proof? Next you will be telling me that the myth of Darwinian evolution has been absolutely proven as well. Do not confuse science with dogma

Answer 11

Please provide your absolute proof source. Even the UN (which libs love) says there is not enough proof. Science is based on facts and not enough facts are available.

However, there is proof that the sun is producing more energy which warms the planet.