English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Who approves of Bush liberating Iraq and Afganistan? (Obviously with an intolerant religion that doesnt allow for free thinking and speech, they will never be liberated, but humour me).
I think it was totally necessary and the most appropriate action that could have been taken was taken.
My only problem is, why are they taking so long to move on to the Fascist/Communist/Terrorist Supporting radicals in Iran??

2007-03-12 02:02:39 · 5 answers · asked by Raging Bull II 2 in Travel Africa & Middle East South Africa

So Moloi you support Islam to Imperialise the world gradually and as sneakily as a serpent?

2007-03-12 03:07:27 · update #1

5 answers

Yes Bush did the right thing and yes i agree that Iran should have been the first choice, they too will crumple as the mind set in that region is to bark but no real bite, all a bunch of cowards when it comes to a major offensive.
It's on the cards just a question of timing and logistic's, Israel will get the ball rolling and the rest will follow.

2007-03-12 04:35:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

That's the problem - that after 9/11 people are talking about the 'liberation' of Iraq and Afghanistan.
You're right in what you say that they can never be liberated because of their violent, evil religion.
Who cares if they're liberated? after 9/11, the USA has no moral responsibility to civilians in Iraq, Afghanistan or any other terrorist harboring/sponsoring nation. The moral responsibility for their deaths in war lie with their own governments.
Bush should've invaded Iran, the world's foremost state sponsor of terror, but at least he did something and removed Saddam Hussein from the face of the Earth.

The eventual invasion of Iran HAS to happen, it is a nation ruled by religious fanatics whose ultimate aim is to destroy everything, including themselves, and move onto an imaginary afterlife.
The USA has to plan and execute this inevitable invasion very carefully though, the Iranian military is hundreds of thousands strong and motivated, unlike the Iraqis that crumbled as the first American military hardware entered the country.

2007-03-12 10:25:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I find your views very offensive. Who are you to say that Muslims are incapable of free thought or speech? You obviously know nothing about Islam.

As regards moving on to the 'Fascist/Communist/Terrorist Supporting radicals in Iran'... do you really imagine that after Iraq the US can invade another country without having its motives called into question? It is up to Iran to deal with its own criminals and terrorists.

2007-03-12 12:10:24 · answer #3 · answered by Professor Plum 3 · 1 1

So, Bull you support Bush admin to imperialise the world!

2007-03-12 10:05:26 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 1 2

i agree with jack.

2007-03-12 12:36:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers