Simply put: A lunatic.
2007-03-12 01:37:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by kaptin2001 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
I think, first off, that you need to have some pretty desperate people who are without much hope.
That comes in at least two forms - they must be at a huge disadvantage against an adversary, and they probably have no hope for economic prosperity.
Desperate situtations make people do desperate things. I think you will find these two situations are almost aways both present in situations were terrorist actions are being used regularly on a large scale.
There are also the isolated incidents, like Timothy McVeigh which have one of the elements but also involve what is probably a deranged mind.
2007-03-12 01:45:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
nobody. It's a derogatory word used by propagandists.
It is supposed to be reserved for those who inflict death and violence on civilians for the express purpose of frightening a population into agreeing to their demands.
In reality it is used mainly by governments to describe anyone who opposes them with arms. Read today's paper, I bet you'll find a quote from a U.S. military officer describing people attacking U.S. soldiers as "terrorists." But attacking soldiers in an occupying army - indeed, attacking any military - is not the act of a terrorist, and responsible journalists avoid this usage strictly except in quotations. The word "insurgent" is used instead.
For the very few people who fit the proper, non-propagandist meaning of "terrorist," they aren't evil. They're driven to their actions by first believing strongly enough in a cause that it becomes more important to them than the lives of the general public. Second, they invariably have no alternative way to achieve their goal.
2007-03-12 01:55:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by kozzm0 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's the same thing that causes people to join cults. People are looking for something to believe in, they're looking for some way to make a difference. Granted, terrorists aren't making a POSITIVE difference, but they've been so brainwashed that they think it's the only way to make things better.
It's really sad if you ask me.
2007-03-12 01:41:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Roland'sMommy 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.
You decide.
2007-03-12 02:07:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by emiliosailez 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you really don't know, why not Google it?
Or, are you making a political statement?
Maybe creating terror would be the answer.
2007-03-12 01:37:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by H.C.Will 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
A person who thinks its okay to kill another human being, because they can't make them believe like they themselves think. A murderer, a dumb, manipulated hate-filled person, with no hope, no love, no care, no concern, and no self-asteem, for themselves. A Muslim, in most cases.
2007-03-12 01:45:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by xenypoo 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
The deliberate attack of citizens it order to protest a government.
2007-03-12 01:49:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
an individual who's sole purpose in life is to inflict as much terror on the population as is possible, he has no goals so he can't be negotiated with.
2007-03-12 01:44:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by al b 5
·
0⤊
1⤋