English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9005566792811497638&q=great+global+warming+swindle&hl=en

Myth busted.

2007-03-12 00:45:19 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Anyone out there not under the mind control of the left and their lies?

2007-03-12 01:01:11 · update #1

8 answers

Thanks - it has more to do with politicians trying to further their careers than it does with us.

Energy efficiency however is a good idea - the oil will not last forever and we should be as careful as we can to waste as little as possible.

2007-03-12 01:03:22 · answer #1 · answered by LongJohns 7 · 1 0

Adam P, you need to do a little more thinking for yourself instead of letting yourself get duped by Al Gore. Al Gore says that the oceans are going to rise 20 feet in the next century. What is his scientific basis for this? The IPCC expects a rise of 17 inches over that period. Gore is lying.
The scientific data is showing that the antarctic is cooling, not warming, so if Al Gore says the antarctic is warming, he is lying. If Gore says that 10 of the last 14 years have been the warmest in history of man, he is lying. The earth is not as warm now as it was in the 14th century. This has been confirmed by both ice core data and tree ring data. The only claim scientists make about recent temperatures is that the are the warmest since temperatures have been recorded, which only includes that last 150 years. This is not unexpected since starting 150 years ago the earth has been coming out of a period of cooling known as the "little ice age."

Pensterx, what is the scientific data that says man is causing global warming? That warming is occuring at the same time CO2 levels are increasing? This is not a link, this is a coincidence. If it was a direct link, then why did the warming start 150 years ago before there was any major burning of fossil fuels? Why was the warming faster between 1910 and 1940, when there was less human CO2 contribution to the atmosphere, than from 1950 to 2000 when CO2 contribution were much greater. Why was there a period of cooling from 1940 to 1950, when human CO2 output was growing steadily? Why was the faster warming and higher temperatures in the 13th and 14th centuries and in the 7th century BC when there was no human contribution to CO2 levels? You can't claim a correlation between temperature and CO2 while dismissing past earth warming that was greater than the warming we are experiencing now, at a time when humans could not have contributed CO2.

2007-03-12 03:05:48 · answer #2 · answered by dsl67 4 · 0 0

that's common that our Earth IS warming up at an alarming fee. No scientist, flesh presser or commonplace citizen interior the international can deny this, because of the fact temperatures are measured frequently everywhere worldwide, and those are turning out to be year on year. Disputable is why this is happening. Your question ought to extra wisely examine " Is worldwide warming led to via mankind, certainty or fiction ?" that's a public difficulty as a results of outcomes, ought to the planet warms up too plenty. do no longer know what sociological mind's eye is, it would not take any mind's eye to acknowledge the way the Earth would be if the universal temperature rises consistent with threat 4 or 5 °C over the subsequent century or so. relatively you could kiss your proverbial backside so long. The ave. temp has risen 0,8 °C interior the final eighty years and this upward push seems to be accelerating, interior the final ten years turning out to be 0,22 °C, it somewhat is astronomic. If that's a organic technique, as some have faith, then the Earth has by no ability warmed up so speedy, over the sort of short volume of time. that's purely unprecidented, and frightening. this is the reason the controversy is so significant, no remember what one believes, the two for, or against the concept in mans involvement. in case you have an hour or so, look into the video hyperlink below. guy has plenty to respond to for, interior the call of lack of know-how, earnings, greed and exploitation. and not varied time to initiate working jointly to settle on the subjects we've led to. and additionally you will furnish me the thumbs down all you decide on, i do no longer provide a toss, yet that would not exchange the information. In my fifty six years I even have viewed for myself that our planet is changing quicker than it may restore itself. Having sailed for some years I witnessed the changing climate first hand. i'm no socialist commie, i'm no longer attempting to administration or cut back your so-referred to as "freedoms", or harm what you have faith to be your democracy. Your super-wealthy minority is already doing all of that.

2016-12-18 20:38:09 · answer #3 · answered by sheck 3 · 0 0

Well Ricardo, I watched the video and the one suggested by LM . Your video gave fact as where the other just discussed what would happen if we did nothing but giving no proof as to cause. However if we cut pollution in general it would be better for everyone, and a SUV that got 40 mpg would be great. I know the Earth is getting warmer, but not sure man can stop it. This has happened at different times during the thousands of years Earth has been here long before man, and will continue long after man is gone.

2007-03-12 03:54:58 · answer #4 · answered by James B 5 · 0 0

Well you obviously haven't read the news today. One of the scientists on the show was actually brought in under false pretences. He is a global warming scientist and the Channel 4 edit basically showed him to state that global warming doesn't exist! Completely the opposite of what he believes. Needless to say, he is pretty pissed off. Remember, one swallow does not a summer make.

There is much more evidence showing human influenced global warming than a natural phenomena!

2007-03-12 01:55:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Have you ever heard of The Inconvient Truth, it won an oscar for Best Documentary this year. Go watch it. Al Gore shows a graph from scientific data from scientists in the Anartic. CO2 is directly linked to global warming and we are causing it! Don't be a fool and listen to that crap from google. This isn't a political tyrade from Al Gore either that's why he is no longer a politician.

I think for myself buddy. You would have to be an absolute moron to think global warming just isn't real. I'm 20 years old. In The Inconvient Truth Al Gore says that the last 14 years have had 10 of the hottest years in the history of man. He backs up his statements with facts, not just saying it like they do in that film you suggested we all watch. Now all I gotta say is that in my area I remember when I was a young child how winter would last from late october into mid april, the past 10 years we have had the shortest winters. This winter lasted from late January until now. We are now having all the snow melt and getting spring weather. This is something I feel very strongly about, especially about where I live, because we have one of the most beautiful winters here. And you want to say it's not global warming, what time frame are you in?

Thank you L M for showing that video. They use the same photo's from the inconvient truth, and they don't base their arguement on one side like this guys video, they go on both sides of the case, giving all the data neccessary for coming to a better conclusion on this issue.

2007-03-12 00:58:21 · answer #6 · answered by Adam P 2 · 0 1

I'm going to bust your myth with

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6037665342514905847&q=global+warming&hl=en

Anyone can make a video and find experts to support whatever point they want to make. This expert is from Harvard, whom I think trumps the expert from Winnipeg.

2007-03-12 01:00:14 · answer #7 · answered by Not so looney afterall 5 · 1 1

Global warming needs to hurry up. Then everyone would have to get naked.

2007-03-12 01:08:45 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers